- Thread starter
- #31
Very interesting, thank you.I'm going to be really boring and shed a bit of daylight on the 10% treat rule rather than the dim 40 Watt bulb it's usually examined under.
This is one of those "truths" that need some context before it makes much sense.
Any addition to commercial balanced feed, be that forage, or other types food given by the keeper will alter the nutrition that the bird receives. We have a pretty good idea of the nutrition and it's composition that will provide a hen with what she needs to live and lay eggs. There has been a lot of research put into this and the evidence overwhelmingly agrees; some people feed their birds nothing but commercial feed and their birds live and lay eggs.
There is the often quoted advice to only give 10% of the hens nutritional intake as treats so one doesn't upset this delicate balance.
What about free range hens fed commercial feed? They are going to forage and eat all kinds of grubs, roots, grasses, seeds, worms, reptiles, mice, other dead birds etc etc. They still lay eggs. The hens I've known were extremely heathy living to 9+ years old provided they avoided getting killed by a predator. Many other people will tell you a similar story. There is zero possibility that a free range chicken will eat less than 10% of it's total diet in forage from dawn till dusk. They still live and lay eggs.
Suppose the treat were to be a few ounces of cooked white fish. The nutritional analysis of both is worth reading about. Do all those extra nutriants and amino acids found in fish reduce the nurtional worth of the commercial feed? Extend this to the forages I've mentioned above and some of them are likely to exceed that percentages of some of the chemicals in the commercial feed.
So, it's what you give as treats that is important and what a chicken forages, not the percentage.
Commercial feed ( produced and fed in massive quantities in the last 100 years) is a relatively new development in rather unfortunate 8000 year history of the chicken. However, they managed to survive and lay eggs for those 7900 years without it.
I recently read an excited report that studies had been done that suggest chcikens know exactly what they need to eat to survive and lay eggs. I wonder how they thought the chicken had lived for the other 7900 years.
One of the prefered feeding methods is to feed a low calcium feed in mixed age and gender flocks and provide a free choice source of calcium. This requires the chicken to make a choice about what they eat and the system works and the chickens live and lay eggs.
Some people do what the large batteries do and keep their chickens confined all their lives and only feed them commercial feed. In such a case then yes the 10% rule makes sense. The large commercial concerns have carried out studies and worked out what a laying hens minimum nutritional requirements are and developed feed to those requirements. The feed is designed to give maximum egg production, or growth, at the minimum cost under fully confined keeping circumstances. Given the feed is at minimum requirements any major percentage change in the balance may have an adverse effect.
In just about any other circumstance it doesn't make any sense at all.
I would prefer to offer more “treats” but I always got caught up in upsetting the balance and not following the 10% rule I’ve heard of.
Their treats mostly consist of wild bird seed and veg, occasionally meat so I don’t think what I offer is very low in nutritional value.
They are definitely eating a lot more feed now then when they used to free range.