- Apr 16, 2011
- 826
- 55
- 226
No, I did not forget Black. Black in Silkies is not genetically the same as Black in almost every other breed. Silkie Black is based on a different base with melanizers (E^R or others)- and every other black breed that I know of is based on Extended Black - totally different base. Oh good grief. Seriously? Who would have thought chicken genetics would be so complicated! I already have two other species' genetics in my poor brain and I honestly don't know that I have room for more!! lol I have been seeing some Silkie chicks on here that appear to have the Extended Black base - so it is coming. Where it is coming from I don't know. However - 99% of the Black Silkie chicks that I see out there are not based on Extended Black. Ok then here's a question..is "pure" black genetically different than bbs black or is it just black that has been bred back to only black for many generations?
Blue is not the same either. Not only being based on the wrong base (the same as Black above) but some lack lacing and some lack the darker head. My "Blue" birds are not correct. Some are closer to correct. Some are based on Partridge bases! So Black and Blue are not included in those colors that genetically match other breed's colors.
And Suze's Partridges do not appear genetically Partridge to me. None of the Silkies I have ever seen do. Please don't get me wrong, I LOVE her Partridges - but they are not PARTRIDGE - they are Partridge Silkies. Please go look at Partridges in every other breed. The front of the girls is not a solid color and it is not lighter than the back. The back of the birds is not black or darker than the front The whole bird is one even color (although I have seen some Partridges with black "collars" around their necks) - not divided like the Silkies are. Patterning on the bird does not make it a Partridge. In Silkies it might - but in the rest of the breeds it does not. I am sorry but neither one of your birds looks genetically Partridge to me.
Well to me Suze's look much closer than what I have. I do have partridge rocks, and honestly a true partridge silkie would not interest me, which is why I said I am rethinking my partridge pen. So then who is the genius that decided that we DO have partridge silkies and standardized it? lol
Find me a Partridge Silkie Hen that looks like THIS:
(not the best picture, I know - but I didn't want to borrow somebody elses - this is my PWB Rear PWB is lighter than her daughter in front. If you want to see good pictures of real Partridge in other breeds go look on Feathersite)
Suse says there are genetically correct Partridge Silkies out there. I have not ever seen a picture of one. Perhaps they come from the dark Partridge breedings and people think they are too dark and cross them with the light birds to get back to the light gold, light front, light brown etc. and loose the proper base and genetics again, I don't know. I want to believe they exist, and I can get some. I have other similar unsupported beliefs.. but I am not holding my breath for proof...
Perhaps I need to add Mahogany to my pair - they are evenly colored - mostlyJust much too light for proper Partridge and with that light front/darker rear...![]()
I assume by mahogany you mean the red silkie that is often used with buff?
All of this is just convincing me further that silkies are not chickens at all;-)