I just can't help but chuckle when I see people falling for this Guineas as tick predators propaganda. Sure, they do eat them, but so do chickens, ducks, turkeys and peafowl. Some time in the last 20 years some enterprising Guinea breeder hit on the idea of appealing to the gullible, spurned on by their heightened fears of things like Lyme disease, to promote this use as a way to sell more Guineas. They have their attraction, but let's face it, their uses are somewhat more limited than other poultry. The appearance and the noise don't help endear them to just the same type of people who are like to fall for a good story like this. Do Guineas range further away from their coop while foraging, covering more ground? Maybe, but a similar sized flock of chickens will do the job just as well. Add a few more if you need more coverage, and you'll get more use out of them than any sized flock of Guineas. Don't get me wrong, I do like and keep Guineas, but I also like to think for myself. Does anyone know where there is more tick borne illness than anywhere else in the world? Africa. Does anyone know where Guineas originated, are still found in the wild, and are still kept domestically as we do? Africa. Hm mm, maybe I'm going to promote chickens there as tick predators. I'll make a killing. Their Guineas obviously haven't gotten the memo about what their job is supposed to be.