So very frustrated

This is one of the vaccines: http://www.jefferslivestock.com/ssc/product.asp?CID=2&pf_id=16784
I don't know anything about it other than it says to give only to healthy birds, from 1-10 weeks of age, with a second dose later. There was something about a booster after the second molt? I'm not sure that it would harm infected birds... perhaps it would cause a 'flare up'? Likely, it just wouldn't do any good.
After looking at the Merck manual... I'm not so sure that the vaccine prevents infection-- rather just helps the symptom severity and helps minimize the egg production losses possible? I'd have to do some more research on that, I guess.


I'd say your vet is misinformed. Now, not always is it transferred to the eggs, but it is... more following the acute illness phase, less so later. Honestly, I'd not hold it against him... it's kinda rare for vets to treat chickens in the first place...and there are some respiratory diseases that aren't passed via egg. Since you have a certain diagnosis of MG... you know what you're facing with certainty at the very least.

Here's what the Merck Veterinary Manual states: http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/index.jsp?cfile=htm/bc/203402.htm

Mycoplasma gallisepticum Infection
(PPLO infection, Chronic respiratory disease, Infectious sinusitis)

M gallisepticum infection is commonly designated as chronic respiratory disease in chickens and as infectious sinusitis in turkeys. Infection may also be seen in pheasants, chukar partridges, and peafowl. Infection in pigeons, quail, ducks, geese, and psittacine birds should be considered. Passerine-type birds are quite resistant, although M gallisepticum is the major cause of natural outbreaks of conjunctivitis in wild house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) in the eastern USA. The disease is worldwide. Its effects are most severe in large commercial operations during winter.

M gallisepticum is the most pathogenic avian mycoplasma; however, strains may differ markedly in virulence. Primary isolation is made in enriched broth medium containing 10-15% serum, then plated on agar. Typical colonies are identified by immunofluorescence.
Transmission, Epidemiology, and Pathogenesis:

In the USA, most breeder flocks are free of M gallisepticum , and outbreaks are due to lateral transmission from infected chickens; however, in some parts of the world, egg transmission is a major source of infection. The incidence of egg transmission is highly variable, ranging up to 30-40% during the first 2 mo after infection of susceptible birds in production. The transmission rate then lessens and is inconsistent (0-5%) until the end of production. Birds infected before the onset of production transmit through the egg at a much lower rate, if at all. The infection may be dormant in the infected chick for days to months, but when the flock is stressed, aerosol transmission occurs rapidly and infection spreads through the flock. Live virus vaccination, natural virus infection, cold weather, or crowding may initiate the spread. In addition, the infection may be carried by personnel (especially from an infected to a clean flock), fomites, or introduction of infected birds. In many flocks, the source of infection cannot be determined.
The epithelium of the upper air passages is most susceptible to infection; however, in severe, acute disease the infection is also found in the lower respiratory tract. There is a marked interaction between respiratory viruses, Escherichia coli , and M gallisepticum in the pathogenesis of chronic respiratory disease. Once infected, birds remain carriers for life.

Clinical Findings:
In chickens, infection may be inapparent or result in varying degrees of respiratory distress, with slight to marked rales, difficulty breathing, coughing, and/or sneezing. Morbidity is high and mortality low in uncomplicated cases. Nasal discharge and frothiness about the eyes may be present. In turkeys, the disease is generally more severe than in chickens, and swelling of the paranasal sinus is common. Feed efficiency and weight gains are reduced. Broilers and market turkeys may suffer high condemnations at processing due to airsacculitis. In laying flocks, birds may fail to reach peak egg production, and the overall production rate is lower than normal.



Lesions:
Uncomplicated M gallisepticum infections in chickens result in relatively mild sinusitis, tracheitis, and airsacculitis. E coli infections are often concurrent and result in severe air sac thickening and turbidity, with exudative accumulations, fibrinopurulent pericarditis, and perihepatitis, particularly in broilers. Turkeys develop severe mucopurulent sinusitis and varying degrees of tracheitis and airsacculitis. The mucous membranes are thickened, hyperplastic, necrotic, and infiltrated with inflammatory cells. Lymphofollicular areas are found in the submucosa.

Diagnosis:
Agglutination reactions and ELISA are commonly used for diagnosis. M gallisepticum should be confirmed by isolation and identification, PCR, or hemagglutination-inhibition because nonspecific false agglutination reactions are common, especially after the inoculation of inactivated, oil-emulsion vaccines or M synoviae infection. Isolates must be identified, because birds may also be infected with nonpathogenic Mycoplasma spp . PCR is commonly used to rapidly detect the organism in upper respiratory tissues. Newcastle disease, infectious bronchitis, influenza, and other respiratory pathogens should be considered in the differential diagnosis.

Treatment and Control:
In the field, many cases of M gallisepticum infection are complicated by other pathogenic bacteria; thus, effective treatment must also attack the secondary invader. Most strains of M gallisepticum are sensitive to a number of antibiotics, such as chlortetracycline, erythromycin, oxytetracycline, spectinomycin, tiamulin, tylosin, or a fluoroquinolone such as enrofloxacin. Antibiotic is usually given in the feed or water for 5-7 days; however, in turkeys, antibiotic may be given initially by injection, followed by feed or water medication. Antibiotics may alleviate the clinical signs and lesions but do not eliminate infection.
Eradication of M gallisepticum from chicken and turkey breeding stock is well advanced in the USA and several other countries. The most effective control program is to identify breeders without serum agglutination or ELISA titers and to maintain seronegative stock. In valuable breeding stock, treatment of eggs, usually with tylosin or heat, may be used to eliminate egg transmission to progeny. Medication is not a good long- term control method but is of value in treating individual infected flocks.
The use of birds free of M gallisepticum is desirable, but infection in multiple-age commercial egg farms where depopulation is not feasible is a problem. An inactivated, oil-emulsion bacterin is available in most countries; it prevents egg production losses but not infection. A live vaccine has been licensed in the USA for use in infected, multiple-age layer flocks but may be used only with permission of the state veterinarian. The vaccine consists of a mild strain of M gallisepticum (F-strain) and is usually given at ~10-14 wk of age. F-strain is of low pathogenicity for chickens but is fully virulent for turkeys. Vaccinated birds remain carriers, and immunity lasts through the laying season. Recently, 2 nonpathogenic live vaccine strains (6/85 and ts-11) have been introduced; these strains offer the advantage of improved safety and are in widespread use in commercial layers.
 
Thanks so much ND for the info and everyone else for your responses. I have decided to treat the flock but honestly, due to the voracity of this illness, if in fact they do have what has been suggested here, I am at a loss as to how to proceed. I love my chickens but the area I'm in is not conducive to a variety of high-quality options for purchasing. It's mostly down-home life-long chicken breeders who won't sell obviously sick birds but who do not do a lot of vaccinating/vet taking for their "low cost" birds. I read another thread on this site wherein several people basically said that the majority of chickens are already carriers of this disease and that the heartiest birds simply do not show symptoms of the illness so when their birds get sick they cull any showing symptoms and keep the healthier birds. Knowing they may be sick. This is my plan, I think, for the future because I do not think I can ever feel safe again buying or selling.(I don't really sell any anyway) And who's to say that anything I bought in the future wasnt infected and not showing symptoms. I applaud those able to enforce the whole "biosecurity" measures, but to be honest, much as I love my chickens, I simply can't see spending that much time/energy/money when they could be asymptomatic and I'm just wasting my time for backyard pets who could take or leave me and who may be sick and I just don't know it. I also do not feel that vet tests of illnesses are reliable as growing up I had two instances where a vet "tested" two cats, claimed both had FLV and gave them a month to live. Needing a second opinion, I took both animals to another vet who "tested" them, found them to be healthy and they both lived for 8-10 years thereafter disease free. Turns out both had a respiratory virus. Tests are not always reliable, IMO.
 
Just "culled" one chick whose eyes were so swollen shut it couldn't see to eat or drink. Not being heartless but I am a mother to two children, a wife to a husband and a flock master to many birds/a cat/3 dogs and I just didn't have the time to hand feed a listless chick who seemed disinterested and had basically wasted away. Hated it just the same. It was a chick from my cochin roo and BR hen and I had so wanted to make a barred cochin...and it was what I had wished for. But I couldn't bear to see it suffer further.
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom