- Jan 14, 2008
- 5,644
- 497
- 303
well, what about the harm to HIS buyers....the ones who respond to his craigslist ads. They thing the photos are the parents of the birds he is selling, when actually they are not. That is about as dishonest as it gets.
And actually, the law states if you do not have specific permission (preferably written!) from the owner of a photo, you cannot legally display it on a website, post it to the Usenet, copy it, send it around by Email or other means, make photos derived from it, sell it, or otherwise exploit it. It's nearly impossible to actually sue someone though, unless you can prove damage. It's still illegal though. It does not become public property just because you posted it on the web.
Under provisions of the Berne Convention you may be right but in this instance it would be difficult for thr owner of the image to show they had experienced any loss as a result of the unauthorized use.