mo_fawaazz
Hatching
- Jan 20, 2026
- 1
- 0
- 4
I have a few khaki campbell hens and a drake. I raise rabbits too, i have a buck and 2 does. I do tend to buy animals in the spring but I find breeding my own to be much more cost effective and even beneficial to keep good strains going. Each of my productive livestock have a replacement period (for rabbits is 3yrs and for ducks is 2yrs), where by that time once they hit a target date (3.5 months before their 2yr mark), they breed, and after 4 months of their offspring growing alongside them, the old breeders are either eaten or given away. this way the offspring are ready to lay/birth soon and can replace the parents and I can avoid having any blank months without many eggs/kits. If any of the new offspring don't do well on the job (for example, a doe kits only three kits every time, or a single duck hen barely lays, a newly-bought replacement awaits them).
The assigned replacement years is because the livestock have a higher risk of becoming lame or less productive after those years. It may seem cruel to assign them replacement dates but its much better that I source eggs and meat with happy animals on healthy diets rather than buying factory-abused store meat and eggs.
The thing is that I want to completely avoid inbreeding and genetic bottlenecks. Because of this, I always replace my males with newly bought males.
I just want to confirm whether this is a safe practice for my farm. Every female is always replaced with her daughter when the time comes, but every male is replaced with a genetically unrelated new store bought male. for both rabbits and ducks, the healthiest daughter is selected to replace the mum. This does avoid inbreeding but I smell something fishy with this because I don't know a lot of people who do this. Most people I know just buy whole new flocks from TSC as replacements.
Is my plan safe for small farm populations? Or is it better to just buy a whole new flock each replacement year?
The assigned replacement years is because the livestock have a higher risk of becoming lame or less productive after those years. It may seem cruel to assign them replacement dates but its much better that I source eggs and meat with happy animals on healthy diets rather than buying factory-abused store meat and eggs.
The thing is that I want to completely avoid inbreeding and genetic bottlenecks. Because of this, I always replace my males with newly bought males.
I just want to confirm whether this is a safe practice for my farm. Every female is always replaced with her daughter when the time comes, but every male is replaced with a genetically unrelated new store bought male. for both rabbits and ducks, the healthiest daughter is selected to replace the mum. This does avoid inbreeding but I smell something fishy with this because I don't know a lot of people who do this. Most people I know just buy whole new flocks from TSC as replacements.
Is my plan safe for small farm populations? Or is it better to just buy a whole new flock each replacement year?
