In response to Bulldogma
Since this isn't a "breed" I think people look more for type than anything else. It can be easy to take standards from breeds and apply them to SFH's, but is that appropriate?
For example, a side spur on the comb is a big no-no on most all breeds. Does that apply to this land race fowl? These birds were chosen for personality traits over appearance, to be good foragers over leg color. I would bet that egg production was important as well as the birds being dual purpose. The ability to withstand cold temperatures likely led to mother nature thinning out the flock and birds more disease resistant made it through those harsh winters.
My point here is that, while we absolutely want to preserve this fowl just as it is, I think it's best to just let them be as wonderfully diverse as they are. I chose my rooster out of the five I had for three reasons: 1) His wonderful personality 2) he was not crested and that's what my personal preference was 3) He was nice and upright, had a full breast, nice sharp color patterns, just overall pleasing to the eye.
I have a variety of hens/pullets. My goal is to keep my flock as diverse as possible to resemble a flock on a small farm in Sweden. If I have to cull I'll choose to keep the friendliest of birds while also making sure that colors and patterns are evenly represented to the best of my ability with what I have. Now, I'm sure that the farmer in Sweden wasn't counting to make sure that he/she had an equal number of colors represented...BUT, since it's harder most of us to keep a huge flock and have lots of birds to choose from it's what I've decided to do.
I'm in no way telling anyone what I think that they should do. This is what I think and what I'm doing and just want to give others my perspective.
edited to fix all the chopped up sentences