- Mar 27, 2009
- 974
- 1
- 141
I don't know, I heard the turnout was disappointing: http://www.vancouversun.com/News/Turnout+tepid+modern+parties/1500117/story.html
I heard the DC party got broken up after someone threw tea bags on the White House lawn. Oops!
As far as being 'grassroots', a lot of folks are calling the movement 'astroturf' instead. These protests weren't prompted by the little guy, but were urged on by some Big Name Big Wigs.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/opinion/13krugman.html
I heard the DC party got broken up after someone threw tea bags on the White House lawn. Oops!
As far as being 'grassroots', a lot of folks are calling the movement 'astroturf' instead. These protests weren't prompted by the little guy, but were urged on by some Big Name Big Wigs.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/opinion/13krugman.html
Last but not least: it turns out that the tea parties dont represent a spontaneous outpouring of public sentiment. Theyre AstroTurf (fake grass roots) events, manufactured by the usual suspects. In particular, a key role is being played by FreedomWorks, an organization run by Richard Armey, the former House majority leader, and supported by the usual group of right-wing billionaires. And the parties are, of course, being promoted heavily by Fox News.
I'm all for protesting whatever people feel the need to protest, but I just can't see this as the highly successful, grassroots movement some folks are billing it as.
I'm all for protesting whatever people feel the need to protest, but I just can't see this as the highly successful, grassroots movement some folks are billing it as.