- Thread starter
- #1,681
Well, I have been in the situation of lowering the level of what I taught because too many students had difficulties. As a librarian I taught a subject, information seeking, which I thought shouldn't even exist on it's own, and there was no way I was ready to flunk a student because of it. I have never attended uni as a student, I was always in selective schools (university is open to everyone in France) so I didn't realize that maybe a quarter of the students didn't have skills supposed to be acquired at the entrance of high school.
I don't think it's a good thing to do, but it's hard to agree that everyone should get a chance at higher education, and maintain a standard of critical thinking.
On maths specifically, I was one of those who really struggled with it, and I chose to stop maths, physics and biology entering high school (it was possible at the time but isn't anymore). I can't tell you how much I regret having done so.
And on statistics more specifically, it turns out that my job as a librarian required teaching databases where basic knowledge was needed for some functionalities. I could show how to obtain linear regression to compare societies in financial databases but couldn't explain precisely what it was. Same with Khi 2 in medical cases and biostatistics databases. Who would have thought ? It's hard to know when you're a teenager or young adult that you should put effort and struggle to learn things that seem irrelevant at the time.
At some point , I think when you specialize in something in your studies, there needs to be a form of selection. It wasn't my point of view before I worked in a university but it is now. Just lowering standards to allow everyone to pass doesn't meet the goal.
On the other hand I think it's very important to allow adults to take up studies again. This for me is a counterpart so that kids who didn't get a chance at some point for many reasons that are not necessarily only related to abilities, can have another chance later on.
@lightm I can't relate to how you feel, but I think I can understand. When we lived with my family for a year in the US 30 years ago it made us laugh so much how the academic system was made so that everyone could get As and Bs and that you even had students suing for low grades. (By the way, many aspects of schools in the US were very interesting and innovative compared to what we had). But we shouldn't have laughed because it has become a crucial problem here as well, and one that has teachers get really upset with one another. I hope your glass of liquor helped you feel a bit better
. And while it's important to fight for your beliefs and your students, remember it's not personal
.
I don't think it's a good thing to do, but it's hard to agree that everyone should get a chance at higher education, and maintain a standard of critical thinking.
On maths specifically, I was one of those who really struggled with it, and I chose to stop maths, physics and biology entering high school (it was possible at the time but isn't anymore). I can't tell you how much I regret having done so.
And on statistics more specifically, it turns out that my job as a librarian required teaching databases where basic knowledge was needed for some functionalities. I could show how to obtain linear regression to compare societies in financial databases but couldn't explain precisely what it was. Same with Khi 2 in medical cases and biostatistics databases. Who would have thought ? It's hard to know when you're a teenager or young adult that you should put effort and struggle to learn things that seem irrelevant at the time.
At some point , I think when you specialize in something in your studies, there needs to be a form of selection. It wasn't my point of view before I worked in a university but it is now. Just lowering standards to allow everyone to pass doesn't meet the goal.
On the other hand I think it's very important to allow adults to take up studies again. This for me is a counterpart so that kids who didn't get a chance at some point for many reasons that are not necessarily only related to abilities, can have another chance later on.
@lightm I can't relate to how you feel, but I think I can understand. When we lived with my family for a year in the US 30 years ago it made us laugh so much how the academic system was made so that everyone could get As and Bs and that you even had students suing for low grades. (By the way, many aspects of schools in the US were very interesting and innovative compared to what we had). But we shouldn't have laughed because it has become a crucial problem here as well, and one that has teachers get really upset with one another. I hope your glass of liquor helped you feel a bit better

