Quote:
I'm glad you posted Sonoran, do you consider mine Buff? It is for sure White and the reddish/orange is in blotches.
I also have some that look like [as some described] a white with sort of an orange cast, for lack of any other thing I'd say they looked Champagne. The color is uniform all over.
I'd sure like an opinion on these strange colors, are these "Champagne" colored birds considered undesirable? How about the Red blotchy ones like I have? They are pretty but I'm not sure they should be called Paints. I'd like to know.
Three Cedars' Red Paint is a beautiful bird and no doubt a Paint, mine don't look that way, so are ones like mine just a weird crop out and not to be spoken of as Paint?
I thank you for your knowledgeable opinion.
I just posted an explanation, but I think that the ones with lots of white are essentially very smutty buffs, but with the black "smut" prevented (or you could say replaced) by dominant white.
Are your champagne birds a similar colour to the off-coloured hackles on some paints--but the entire bird is coloured that way rather than just hackles? Like this:
Or something different? The one I showed is one of my champagne paints. I have several, but have also gotten paints without the champagne ground colouring from them. I am speculating that those with off-coloured hackles and the champagne ground are likely gold, then cleanest paints are probably silver.
I think to be called "paint" it needs large spots of colour. A paint background is just that--a part of its heritage, but not necessarily its appearance or genotype. If a parent bird has a single comb, but the offspring does not, you don't call the offspring single combed. Likewise, if it does not have spots, it is not paint.
As for desirable or undesirable, well, different people have different things they like or dislike, and there really is no standard for paints. As far as I know, no one has even come up with a defined working standard. I think most of us assume a few things: white background, larger, bold patches of black.
Things that I don't think any of us have considered, or at least not put down in words--how much black is too much? or how little black is too little? should off-coloured hackles be a defect or a disqualification? Or even part of the variety description?
Should we also accept those with an entire champagne ground colour, and spots on it? (my vote here would be yes--I like the look). What about a white ground with red spots? Or blue? Or chocolate?