- Nov 16, 2013
- 26
- 5
- 30
One of the principles you need to keep in mind is that genetic diversity equals variation. If you want everyone to look different, then genetic variation is the way to go. If you want them to look the same, then genetic variation is your enemy. The purpose of standard breeding is to reduce the genetic variation and to set a type so that at either extreme, there is very little difference between individuals.
I would recommend that you look at various Buckeye lines. Go to some shows and see what's out there. Surf the web and the forums and look at LOTs of pictures of Buckeyes to see ones you like. It's overwhelming at first, but after you do it for a while (I was over six months web surfing before I bought my first chick) you begin to figure out what it is that you are looking for and who has it. Once you know what you want and where to get it, place a couple orders from the same breeder, cull rigorously, and give it a go. If you need "new" blood, order from your original source (because you picked a good one to start with, right?) and add them to your flock. As I said to Chris, I don't know what the advantage is to buying from two lines IF you are able to start with a good line of spiral bred Buckeyes to begin with. Just continue the closed flock breeding program that they had started. After all, that's what the original breeder is likely doing. Right? Why mess up a good thing with an outcross?
Thanks Marengoite, I haven't figured out how to do multiple quotes from different posts yet, but your last two posts on this topic really hit the nail on the head. I'm new to showing and breeding for show, but not completely new to chickens and breeding to the standards. It's funny how the modern theory is to have "genetic diversity", which as you well stated is for the purpose of variation when the goal of breeders breeding to the SoP is to eliminate variation. As I see it, the only reason for doing an out cross is if your line has lost a required trait through careless breeding.
When in doubt, I try to go back for evidence based, breeding techniques. One of the best resources I've found is the Master breeder of Buckeye, Mrs. Nettie Metcalf herself. Take a look at what she said about in-breeding in the Poultry Success October, 1917 issue. Here's the link.
http://books.google.com/books?id=cc...epage&q=nettie metcalf corner of yard&f=false
"The back yard was fenced and there were big picket gates on the place which nearly always stood open, so I got a boy to help me unhinge a couple and carry them across two corners of the back yard; then I borrowed a couple of big boxes for coops, and what more was needed? I penned up two pairs in these small enclosures. Had I to do this over again, I would have started with one pair, but I was afraid of in-breeding in those days, so I doubled my troubles by starting with two pairs, thus getting the defects of four progenitors instead of two.
My! What a flock I raised that year! No wonder my friends laughed! Green legs and feathered legs, buff chicks, black chicks and even red-and-black barred chicks; single combs and pea combs, and no combs at all, but fighters from way back."
I don't know about you, but I don't want to reinvent the wheel. My first year of hatching Buckeyes I just flock mated the best ones in the same pen and figured I'd pick the best ones from that. Boy was that a mess. This last year I did much better, took a single pair of the best I originally had to start working on the type and color just as Nettie said she would have started with. Thanks for sharing and helping to explain what my gut instincts were telling me.