eagrbeavr
Chirping
Thanks BlackBriarsI'd put chick #2 firmly in the pullet camp. Leaning cockerel on #1. I'd toss'em a bag of turkey grower.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks BlackBriarsI'd put chick #2 firmly in the pullet camp. Leaning cockerel on #1. I'd toss'em a bag of turkey grower.
Minnie I took notice that you said she. So I hope I"m not being an annoyance
I am excited to say I am a proud owner of two trios of Buckeyes from Minnie! I had a great time visiting with u Minnie and hope to be able to do alot more of it! U have beautiful birds and they produce beautiful offspring!
Last year I got 7 Buckeye chicks from a breeder here in Eastern Canada. They were absolutely not wheaton type (eWh) chicks, but totally wild type (e+) chipmunk chicks, with partridgey heads on a few. I really like the oldest male--he is beautiful, dark, large, and not nasty. To me, they are similar to my old Araucanas is size, shape, demeanor-- somewhat "Cornish" in type. The Araucanas are the oldest living birds I have, with 4-5 close to 10 years old, my oldest hen has quite long spurs, but still lays and goes broody.
I'd love if the Buckeyes did so well!
5 of 7 were female. (Because I bought them totally to use as a meat bird, lol!) Of them--I lost one to a fox while broody on her first clutch. One male I called a "dummy" for lack of a better word--really, really stupid, very slow feathering, and culled him. One pullet who lays huge eggs--is completely Cornish in type, with lacing, and also "Dumb". As in--can't find her way back to the barn--but she's meaty. I keep her in my laying flock, as she lays well.
Another one lacking the lacing--but the same Cornish like face, died this winter. So of the original 6, I had 4 left, would not breed the laced hen because she's not right. I did get another young pullet and cockerel--with the hopes of using these as dual purpose, the hens do lay well, but a second hen has gone broody twice since coming into lay in the fall.
The oldest male I think is wonderful. Would he show well? Not sure, but I like everything about him, and he's a good weight. He's worth keeping at least for my laying hens.
Now--it's early spring in Nova Scotia--so it's been cold, wet, snowy and the birds have been confined in the barn most of the winter--this fellow comes out looking like he's been dipped in polish, he's so shiny. These pictures are actually a little deceiving.
I'd love if he had a nice tight comb and wattles, but he doesn't. Can I work with him as the sole male? No idea--I hope to add to this group if it's worthwhile, and I think I can work with them. The second male is younger, I did not see his down colour at hatch, and to me he's too light. He is not pictured here, this is all the same guy. I'm concerned about the chick's down colour though, because that was wrong from the get-go.
I have some torpedo shaped eggs too--same breeder--but in my Marans and a Welsummer. I can't see hatcheability being good on any of those eggs--no room for a chick to grow.The comb and wattles on your rooster are better than the comb and wattles on mine(from a different line).
But I have the same issue with an east coast hen, she was an e+ chick, she has too much black, and doesn't look like a buckeye really except for sort of red body and black tail ...... and she lays large dark eggs too, but torpedo shaped.
But there are some good genes in that East Coast line, , and I have some Buckeye eggs in the incubator that were sired by a very handsome half brother (or whatever!) of yours that made the cut from a lot of other birds from a lot of other breeders. These eggs were shipped from western Canada, unfortunately well scrambled by the courier, so I don't know how many if any will hatch.
For sure, I'd keep that rooster! A good temperament is worth its weight in gold and if he comes from a line of good producing hens, that's good too.