The NFC B-Day Chat Thread

Until the fuel is gone? I'm totally lost there.
Research conducted by fire scientist Anthony Westerling shows that between 1973 and 1982, fires burned for an average of six days. Between 2003 and 2012, this number skyrocketed to nearly seven and half weeks (52 days). This builds upon previous research published a decade earlier, which found an increase in average fire duration to more than five weeks.

"So long as there is fuel and it doesn’t rain or snow, a fire can burn, and burn, and burn," Pyne said. (He cited the exceptionally long-burning Chinchaga Fire, which raged from May through October in 1950.)

These numbers show when a fire has been "controlled," a somewhat blurry definition generally meaning that firefighters have contained the fire's perimeter, and the likelihood of flames or embers escaping is quite small, said Pyne. It doesn't mean the fires are completely out.

This is a critically important indicator for the millions living in the urban-rural fire interface, for example, Redding, California.

But deep inside the woods, the flames can continue.

"It's not like a house fire — it can burn and smolder for a long time," said Pyne. "When you're talking about something that's 300,000 acres, are you going to be able to go in with shovels on your back and put out every ember?"
 
Research conducted by fire scientist Anthony Westerling shows that between 1973 and 1982, fires burned for an average of six days. Between 2003 and 2012, this number skyrocketed to nearly seven and half weeks (52 days). This builds upon previous research published a decade earlier, which found an increase in average fire duration to more than five weeks.

"So long as there is fuel and it doesn’t rain or snow, a fire can burn, and burn, and burn," Pyne said. (He cited the exceptionally long-burning Chinchaga Fire, which raged from May through October in 1950.)

These numbers show when a fire has been "controlled," a somewhat blurry definition generally meaning that firefighters have contained the fire's perimeter, and the likelihood of flames or embers escaping is quite small, said Pyne. It doesn't mean the fires are completely out.

This is a critically important indicator for the millions living in the urban-rural fire interface, for example, Redding, California.

But deep inside the woods, the flames can continue.

"It's not like a house fire — it can burn and smolder for a long time," said Pyne. "When you're talking about something that's 300,000 acres, are you going to be able to go in with shovels on your back and put out every ember?"
Now I'm totally aware and really shocked. 🙏 for your safety

We are definitely lucky here as regards the fires here.
 
Now I'm totally aware and really shocked. 🙏 for your safety

We are definitely lucky here as regards the fires here.
The fires are terrible!

We get the smoke here but it is a lot of days! We get around 4 months of it on average. Places up north in the Valley-- about 150 miles or so-- get 5 to 6 months of smoke.

The smoke is more toxic when vehicles and houses burn.
 
The fires are terrible!

We get the smoke here but it is a lot of days! We get around 4 months of it on average. Places up north in the Valley-- about 150 miles or so-- get 5 to 6 months of smoke.

The smoke is more toxic when vehicles and houses burn.
Why do people want to live there with all that smoke, Uffda! I can’t handle a weeks worth.
Good afternoon everyone. Thank you for the well wishes! I’m home, my eye is still taped shut. About 15 minutes to go and I take it off :)
Awesome!
 
Why do people want to live there with all that smoke, Uffda! I can’t handle a weeks worth.
We did not have this much smoke until recently. Some years we would have no smoke at all.

Hopefully some of the new fire retardant methods will help.
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom