Quote:
Here is the response I posted on my page: This article, the way it is written, is very misleading, and does more damage than good. 1. 5,000 birds is NOT a small flock. While it's not the number of birds found on the commercial industrialized poultry farms, it's still not a small flock. 2. Mortality rates of 50 - 60% are NOT uncommon, depending on the disease affecting the flock. 3. It says that no treatment had been initiated because the farm was organic, however, there are several poultry diseases that there are no real treatment options available. 3. They mention finding unvaccinated birds, and make it sound like that is part of the problem, however, what they fail to mention is that many current vaccines are "leaky" vaccines, and very ineffective. 4. From the conditions described, the major factors seem to be lack proper habitat, along with enough supplies, and manpower for maintaining sanitary conditions. 5. While they decry inexperience as a huge problem, and it can be, let's not forget that the H5 avian flu outbreaks began in experienced commercial industrialized farms. 6. While the article mentions resistance to total depopulation, it doesn't mention whether they are trying to keep some of the survivors in an effort to breed for resistance. 7. They mention the demand for organic products limiting the types of intervention that can be used, however, even though limited, in many states there are types of intervention that can be used in regards to diseased flocks. This article comes across as pro-commercial poultry keeping, anti-backyard flock keeping, and pro-goverment control over all poultry keeping, which is nonsense.
You are absolutely right about the article as being misleading.... an example of spin....
deb