I have fed my Muscovy ducklings chick starter, but found they do much better with turkey starter.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes they were call ducks.Maybe they were common ducklings and not muscovy ducklings?
There you go, then.Yes they were call ducks.
Maybe the chick starter feeds in Sweden are formulated differently than the chick starter feeds in the US? I say this because I have fed mine nothing but the high protein feed and have not had any problems with angel wing.There you go, then.
I really want to stress that they are different species. They are NOT different breeds of the same species, in the manner that all chickens breeds are the same species, all dog breeds are the same species or all cat breeds are the same species. Breeds of the same species are pretty much the same except for in appearance. Different species are a whole different matter.
Yes, or maybe your muscovies simply don't have the angel wing gene. Some people in Sweden have also fed their scovie hatchlings tons of chick starter without issues. It seems they need a predisposition for angel wing in order to develop it.Maybe the chick starter feeds in Sweden are formulated differently than the chick starter feeds in the US? I say this because I have fed mine nothing but the high protein feed and have not had any problems with angel wing.![]()
I think there are many factors to consider when it comes to angel wing, genetics, vitamins, minerals, and protein. There is one vet book that suggests angel wing and perosis share the same etiology. I'll see if I can find that.Yes, or maybe your muscovies simply don't have the angel wing gene. Some people in Sweden have also fed their scovie hatchlings tons of chick starter without issues. It seems they need a predisposition for angel wing in order to develop it.
So, the way I see it, you can take one of two routes: 1) feed them chick starter and cull all individuals with angel wing, and hopefully be rid of it within a few generations, or 2) don't feed them chick starter and never get angel wing.
I'm not saying one route is better than the other.
Remember that muscovy ducks and ducks are two different species, with very different growth rates, and therefore, very different nutritional needs as ducklings!
More to the point: duck ducklings (henceforth called "common ducklings") do well on chick starter feed for the first few weeks. I've seen it recommended on more than one occasion. Muscovy duck ducklings (henceforth called "muscovy ducklings") should not be fed chick starter feed for more than 1-2 weeks, if at all.
We fed our muscovy ducklings chick starter feed for three weeks. This caused their outer wing bones to grow too fast, causing the condition known as angel wing.
This is the horrible result:
View attachment 1248780
View attachment 1248782
View attachment 1248783
So what to do instead? Well, all our other batches (they've been five or so) have been eating basic chicken pellets instead, and they had zero instances of angel wing. I'm no statistician, but the correlation is overwhelming.
Ordinary chicken pellets does have one problem, though: They are a little bit too big for the ducklings' beaks the first week. So I recommend crushing them or soaking them the first week, or maybe give them chick starter feed (which is much finer) for one week.
I want to stress that feeding common ducklings is a whole different matter.
Yes. I believe someone on this page suggested angel wing is caused by too little niacin in relation to other amino acids, and that was the problem with chick starter, not the protein content in itself.I think there are many factors to consider when it comes to angel wing, genetics, vitamins, minerals, and protein. There is one vet book that suggests angel wing and perosis share the same etiology. I'll see if I can find that.