I am starting year four in a long-term project to develop what is to be called the Missouri Dominique. It is a composite of American Dominique, American Game and California grey. Now that backcrossing is stopped, subsequent generations will be just over 1/2 American Dominique, about 1/3 American Game with the balance being California grey. All birds are carry at least one copy of the rose comb allele and about 1/3 carry the pea comb allele (coming from the American Game side) at their respective loci where the alternative allele for each loci are for the wild-type single comb. Male birds with both rose comb and peacomb alleles have been performing very well with respect to growth and type probably based on chance. After two winters of suffering my keep the walnut phenotype has done very well showing no signs of frostbite related injuries and their fertility has been very good. Rose comb is good but not as good. Based on parentage all birds in breeding pens are currently heterozygous at both loci. I am thinking very seriously selecting so birds are homozygous at both loci needed to code for walnut comb. Not only will the phenotype then breed true, it will hopefully also help further tighten comb and wattles reducing concern about frostbite.
Is the walnut phenotype associated with reduced fertility when birds are homozygous for the trait?
Is the walnut phenotype associated with reduced fertility when birds are homozygous for the trait?