Quote:
Eat? Tiny eggs? Well there's your problem, you're only interested in 'using' chickens instead of loving them as pets.
Bantams are mostly sought after as pets -which you're obviously aware of- so I guess don't get bantams. For you I advise 'meat birds'.
I think that might be a bit of a leap of logic about someone's nature. I personally keep my hens as pets, but it is critical that they feed me as well, because my family and I are going through economic hardship.
To be honest, I kind of view bantams as a privilage pet. I personally couldn't afford my birds if they were bantams, because there is no market in my area for tiny eggs. As it stands now, my girls produce huge eggs almost daily, which feeds us, pays for their own feed, and helps me bake items to sell.
Maybe someday if our economic conditions improve we can afford less utilitarian birds, but it doesn't make us people who don't appreciate the pet aspect of our birds. Maybe that is the angle that ChickieBooBoo was coming from too.
I'm quite in the same boat. I enjoy animals, but they are animals and I draw the line at utility.
I swore off cats and dogs because I spent astronomical amounts of money on my cats, and for what? Two 10lb monsters who tear up my pantry, eat MY food when THEIR dishes are full, and stink up my house with their poop.
Chickens feed me breakfast and dinner, tolerate me holding them when I want to and don't care a lick when I don't, and do not set foot in my house (though they do PLENTY of pooping on my porch!). When all 6 are laying they will feed my household and hopefully pay for their own feed as Pele mentioned.
I enjoy them, but they are livestock because they serve a purpose to me and the community. In my situation and in my community, bantams do not serve a purpose. Perhaps it is more appropriate to label bantams as "pets" and large fowl as "livestock" (though LF can certainly have the personalities to fit their size, as any plymouth rock would be sure to tell you!).
Eat? Tiny eggs? Well there's your problem, you're only interested in 'using' chickens instead of loving them as pets.
Bantams are mostly sought after as pets -which you're obviously aware of- so I guess don't get bantams. For you I advise 'meat birds'.
I think that might be a bit of a leap of logic about someone's nature. I personally keep my hens as pets, but it is critical that they feed me as well, because my family and I are going through economic hardship.
To be honest, I kind of view bantams as a privilage pet. I personally couldn't afford my birds if they were bantams, because there is no market in my area for tiny eggs. As it stands now, my girls produce huge eggs almost daily, which feeds us, pays for their own feed, and helps me bake items to sell.
Maybe someday if our economic conditions improve we can afford less utilitarian birds, but it doesn't make us people who don't appreciate the pet aspect of our birds. Maybe that is the angle that ChickieBooBoo was coming from too.
I'm quite in the same boat. I enjoy animals, but they are animals and I draw the line at utility.
I swore off cats and dogs because I spent astronomical amounts of money on my cats, and for what? Two 10lb monsters who tear up my pantry, eat MY food when THEIR dishes are full, and stink up my house with their poop.
Chickens feed me breakfast and dinner, tolerate me holding them when I want to and don't care a lick when I don't, and do not set foot in my house (though they do PLENTY of pooping on my porch!). When all 6 are laying they will feed my household and hopefully pay for their own feed as Pele mentioned.
I enjoy them, but they are livestock because they serve a purpose to me and the community. In my situation and in my community, bantams do not serve a purpose. Perhaps it is more appropriate to label bantams as "pets" and large fowl as "livestock" (though LF can certainly have the personalities to fit their size, as any plymouth rock would be sure to tell you!).