Why did they do that on Survivor!

Sgsf

Songster
9 Years
May 4, 2010
305
2
119
It made me soooo mad! When they decided to eat one of the three chickens, they eat a hen instead of eating the rooster. They had two hens and one rooster, and when they wanted to eat something, they decided to take a HEN. I mean come on! Leave them for egg production, and eat the Rooster at least.
 

redhen

Kiss My Grits...
Premium Feather Member
11 Years
May 19, 2008
35,106
196
458
Western MA
maybe they wanted to save the roo for fertile eggs....so they can have MORE chickens.
 

sgtmom52

Birds & Bees
12 Years
Jun 1, 2007
5,805
253
328
Northern York County ~ Pennsylvania
Quote:
Not likely as it only takes 7 weeks to film an entire season!

Maybe they thought you needed the rooster for eggs.

lau.gif
 

gryeyes

Covered in Pet Hair & Feathers
10 Years
Sep 22, 2009
15,506
431
358
My slice of heaven in Somerset, CA
It sure was a dumb move all right. Idiots.

I was yelling at my TV set, then, because I was online at the time, I yelled in ALL CAPS at my best friend in IM conversation. Poor woman - she doesn't even GET CBS, much less get to watch Survivor!
 

DTchickens

Crowing
11 Years
Mar 23, 2008
4,394
60
253
Bailey, Mississippi.
Quote:
Truthfully, if I was stranded somewhere (I never even watch the show) I'd probably save the rooster and one hen.. Or maybe even both hens, one hens eggs for food-the other to go broody?

-Daniel
 

MakNugget

Songster
9 Years
May 31, 2010
467
5
111
Portland, OR
Quote:
I bet you money that is exactly why.

X2

Average Joe does not know the birds and the bees when it comes to chickens. I learned a lot from research, and they just assume eggs only come out because they are a product of fertilization.
 

MANNA-PRO

New posts New threads Active threads

Top Bottom