Quote:
That is the site I was referring to. That is
in no way an official anything or authoritative...and just plain full of misinformation to boot. It's written as tongue in cheek. Or perhaps someone became insulted when told they didn't have what they thought they had. It's a complete joke site, folks. Good grief, there certainly
are white EEs! Look at their color list, for heavens sake. I'd hate for someone to think that was authoritative on the subject.
I'm not sure this subject is worth getting worked up over.
Why on earth this causes so much confusion is beyond me. Almost very modern day breed we have came from combining other breeds, then were standardized so they bred true. Same with Ameraucanas. I'm not sure why this is an issue, really. Wyandottes came from Cochins, among others, but we still have Cochins and Wyandottes aren't controversial in the least.
Okay, I'm backing out now. Let's not get too much like this here, please
http://i673.photobucket.com/albums/vv95/Mtnviewpoultry/Emoticons/catfight2.gif or yet another EE/Ameraucana/Araucana thread will have to die a sad, horrid death.
I don't mean this directly about this thread. Really, I don't. You are so right though. Breed development, in general, (and outcrossing too actually) is something that is just almost impossible to have an intelligent conversation about. People just lose their minds and go crazy and act like the sky is falling. The issue you describe with the blue egg layers has additional layers of confusion and controversy as well, things said that I rarely see said about other breeds. I am not sure why.
Anyway, that said.... when people do talk about breed development, there are always people that as I said, "lose it". It is just a conversation that rarely seems to be had (probably because experienced breeders recognize that it is futile). Maybe it is just because people simply do not
know or stop to think about how breeds and varieties are developed. Most of my experience in recent years has been with waterfowl and I see this all the time. It is like a lot of people think that breeds or new varieties have just materialized out of thin air. Which brings me to my next observation, something that I really find funny (and I
don't mean this about the A/A/EE's).... In the hands of one person, a bird could be nothing more than a "mixed breed" or a "mutt" and the hands of another person the very same bird could be an exciting or rare "new variety" or "non-standard color". Something to ponder. Again, that last statement doesn't apply as much to the birds this thread is about just because with these birds there seems to be more indiscriminate crossing and there is a big difference between that are very intentional/planned outcrossing. That said, my point is that there is a certain amount of politics in the development of new varieties.