An Experiment in Chick Sexing Methods
We’ve all heard them, those crazy methods for sexing chicks that sound too far-fetched to be true. Often, they are not even backed by good reasoning, and so any logical person would chuckle at the suggestion and brush it off as absurd. But so many swear by these methods that one has to wonder, could they possibly work? Anyone who has discovered the addictive nature of hatching chicks could use a simpler and easier way of sexing the many chicks they hatch, right? And why would these methods gather such a following if they did not work?
To test these methods, possibly the best route would be to hatch hundreds of chicks, test all of them, and report the results once they have matured enough to determine their actual sex. Unfortunately, I have neither the time, nor the coop space for such a task. Instead, I will be performing these various methods on as many chicks as I can as I hatch or buy them, and then gathering the data from all of these chicks here over time. Only I will be performing these tests to remove any uncertainty in the uniformity of how tests are performed. Both straight run and sexed chicks may be included here, but because knowing the sex of the chicks beforehand may cause some subconscious skewing, results from sexed chicks will always be reported separately from those of unsexed chicks.
Chick sexing methods were chosen by their commonness, strangeness, or seeming unlikeliness. However, I did have just one ground rule in choosing sexing methods. I decided before I started this experiment that I would NOT do any method that I believe may hurt or cause trauma to any of these chicks. That means I will NOT be lifting them by their beaks, wings, heads, feet, or the backs of their necks, or doing any other method that sounds like it could be harmful to them. To me, enough people have tried these methods unsuccessfully that it is not worth me compromising the health or trust of my chicks just for this experiment. Beyond that, if it seems silly or far-fetched, or it’s very different than any of the other methods I’ve tried, I’m willing to give it a shot! I’m also open to suggestions, so if you have a method that is sufficiently different than the ones already listed on this page, feel free to send it to me in a PM!
Chicks subjected to sexing methods will be of various breeds, all under the age of 4 weeks old when tested. All chicks will be straight run (that is, their sexes were unknown) unless otherwise stated. Subjects are grouped below by hatch date and breed. Subjects from previous broods of chicks will be hidden in 'Spoiler' drop downs to keep the page a bit shorter. Click the blue boxes below to see pictures and more information about previous subjects.
Hatch date: January 4 and 5, 2017
Variety and Breed: Partridge and Red Cochin bantams
Identification: Identified by markings used to distinguish eggs; Abie, Alpha, Lucky, Onesie, and Omega
Hatch date for all of these chicks is assumed to be April 3, 2017.
Variety and Breed: Dark Gray Dorkings
Identification: Identified by breed and marker colors added to their heads; DD-Blue, DD-Green1, DD-Green2, DD-Brown, and DD-Purple
Variety and Breed: Red Dorkings
Identification: Identified by breed and marker shapes added to their heads; RD-X, RD-O, RD-Dot, RD-Line, and RD-Z. Not pictured is RD-Squirt, who was included in the experiment later. Sadly, RD-Z passed away before its sex could be determined.
Variety and Breed: Black Copper Marans
Identification: Identified by breed and a color spot added to their chests; BCM-Blue, BCM-Green, and BCM-Purple
Variety and Breed: Wheaten Marans
Identification: The only one of this breed and variety, so simply identified as WM
Hatch date: March 3 and 4, 2018
Variety and Breed: Black Copper / possibly Birchen Marans
Identification: Identified with the numbers written on their eggs; distinguished by colored leg bands
More Dorkings and Cochin bantams also coming later this year!
Below, you will find details of all of the sexing methods used in this experiment. The names of these tests is what will be used in tables and figures in the Results section. Due to time constraints, not all chicks have been tested with every sexing method. It will be apparent when a test has not been performed on every chick by the tables and figures in the Results section.
To keep the page a bit shorter, please click the blue box below to open the spoiler and read the different methods. If you're simply returning to check on the results, then you can leave the spoiler closed and not have to scroll past all of the descriptions again!
This is a classic method that is used by big hatcheries, but the thing that people don’t take into account is that it is a trait that must be bred for—not every chick from every source will be accurately sexed using this method! The reason I chose to add this one to the experiment is because so many people spread it as a 100% true sexing method for all chicks. In wing sexing, when the chicks are only a few days old at most, males have a short, even row of pin feathers on their wings, and females have a staggered row of short and long pin feathers on their wings. The picture below (from this thread) shows the difference.
Tail Feather Method
I believe this is an extension of the above method, but I figured it was worth mentioning. In this method, females get their tail feathers in sooner than males.
Tail Tap Method
By this method, when tapping the chicks on the tail, only males chirp in response and females are silent.
Tail Pull Method
In this method, you gently pull on the chicks’ tails. If they are male, they chirp in response, while if they are female, they are silent.
Needle and Thread Pendulum Method
This is a method that many, MANY people swear by, both for sexing chicks and unborn human babies, too! In this method, you hang a metal needle from a thread above the chick. If it moves back and forth in a straight line, the chick is male. If it makes a little circle with its swing, the chick is female.
Lay on Back Method
In this method, you carefully lay the chick on its back in your hand. If it struggles to right itself, it is male. If it relaxes and just lays there, it is female.
Leg Stretch Method
In this method, you carefully lay the chick on its back in your hand. If it stretches its legs out, it is male, while if it keeps its legs tucked in, it is female. I considered all tests in which the chick consistently kept one leg tucked and stretched out the other to be inconclusive.
Pick Up Method
By this method, when picking a chick up around its body from above and allowing its feet to dangle, a female will pull its feet up and a male will just let its feet dangle.
In this method, you surprise the chicks in one way or another and gauge how they react. Many people suggest throwing a hat into the brooder, but one can also make a loud noise, BRIEFLY flap a flag or cloth over the brooder, or any other method that might surprise the chicks. If a chick stands up or stays where it’s standing, it is male. If a chick ducks down or runs for cover, it is female. For this experiment, I made a loud noise.
String Peck Method
In this method, you dangle a piece of string in the brooder. If a chick pecks it more than twice, it is male. If it pecks the string only once or is disinterested, it is female.
Pick Up Chirp Method
By this method, when picking up a chick, only the males chirp indignantly. Females remain silent.
Tail Fan Method
For this method, you must wait until the chicks have tail feathers. When holding them, if you tip them forward suddenly, only females fan their tail feathers. Males don’t move their tails.
Penny Toss Method
For this method, you rub a penny on the back of the chick in question, and then flip the coin. If it lands on heads, the chick is male, and if it lands on tails, the chick is female.
Vinegar Water Method
According to this method, when offered a dish of plain water beside a dish of white vinegar water (at the rate of 1 tablespoon white vinegar per 8 ounces of water), males will prefer plain water and females will prefer vinegar water. To make sure the water was the only thing the chicks were deciding on, I used identical dishes with identical amounts of fluid in them.
Vent Shape Method
According to this method, male and female chicks have different vent opening shapes. This is not the same as vent sexing, which requires one to know the difference between the internal part of the vent, but is instead simply looking at the shape of the vent from the outside. Males have small, round vent openings and females have wider, oval-shaped vent openings.
Comb Length Method
This method states that chicks whose combs end at or past the front edge of their nostrils are male, and chicks whose combs end before there are female. See this thread for more details: Comb Sexing Chicks
Egg Shape Method
I am putting this one last because I will not be able to use this method on all chicks, only the ones I hatch. By this method, males hatch out of narrow, pointy eggs, and females hatch out of shorter, rounder eggs. I will not be selecting eggs based on shape for this method, but I will record the egg shapes and track which chick hatches out of which egg as much as I am able.
Work in progress! For now, you can view all of the major results on this Google Spreadsheet. There are tabs at the bottom to switch between results by test and results by chick. Please note that I will not add any chick's results to the 'results by test' tab on the spreadsheet OR to the below graphs until their sex is confirmed! I will, however, put them in the 'results by chick' section in the spreadsheet as a means of recording the data until results can be confirmed.
The spread of male, female, and inconclusive predictions by test. At minimum, five chicks were tested in each method, and at maximum there were 19 chicks tested. On the right is the actual ratio of males and females so far.
Accuracy of each test is depicted in the below graph showing the percentage of correct predictions by test. Again, some tests were performed on more chicks than others, with a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 19 chicks so far.
The below graphs show the percentage of correct predictions made by each method, separated by breed. When separated out by breed, more tests were able to achieve 100% accuracy. However, sample sizes are still small (only 4-5 chicks per breed), and so these results should not be taken as law.
The below graph is a combination of all Dorking chicks, rather than the above graphs which separate them by variety as well. There have been a total of 10 Dorking chicks tested so far.
Work in progress! Here are a few notes for now:
- No method was 100% accurate, except for when results were separated by breed. However, when separating by breed, sample sizes become very small (4-5 chicks per breed), and so that data is not very strong proof of anything yet.
- When not separating by breed, the Lay on back method was about 80% accurate, but about 80% of the chicks also reacted by struggling, the supposed predictor for male chicks, and most of the chicks ended up being male. It can be noted that of the four incorrectly predicted chicks, three were females that reacted as males to the test. This implies that struggling is the common reaction of ALL chicks when laid on their back, not just male chicks.
- Vent shape was also 80% accurate, but had a small sample size of only 5 chicks, and so more tests will need to be performed to confirm accuracy.
- So far, the Pick Up, String Peck, Pick Up Chirp, and Tail Fan methods have had consistent reactions of all chicks tested with those methods. In other words, all chicks tested with those methods have reacted in the same way, implying that they are all the same sex if those methods were true. This also implies that all chicks react in the same way to these tests, not based on their sex, but since the sample sizes were small on these tests, more chicks will need to be tested to confirm that.
- Several tests also had the same reaction in all chicks of the same breed and variety, suggesting that they are related to breed and not sex.
- Comb Length was the most inconclusive, with 6 of the 19 chicks having inconclusive results. Comb lengths were hard to determine, as there was a gray area where a comb may have been at the end of the nostrils from one angle, but not from another angle.
- Besides Comb Length, Leg Stretch was the next most inconsistent, with 4 out of the 14 chicks tested stretching one leg out while tucking the other in. Some say that even when only one leg is stretched out, this still means the chick is male. In this case, the accuracy of that test would rise from about 14.3% to about 28.6%, but it would still remain as the least accurate test.