🔥Extra! Extra! WE ARE ABOUT IT✅

Are you in it to win it?


  • Total voters
    86
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pics
I think he just wants to wait and retest in March and see if it’s still bad then before the official diagnosis because the notes did mention retesting so idk
Keep in mind, the more tests he does, the more money he makes from your insurance. A lot of people don't realize that. They will do all sorts of testing, whether or not you need it, just because the doctor says it's time. I'm turning 40 in a month. My doc says it's time to get a mammogram. Nope. Not until I feel I need to. I have a very low chance of getting breast cancer, so why pay the doctor for testing I don't need?
 
Keep in mind, the more tests he does, the more money he makes from your insurance. A lot of people don't realize that. They will do all sorts of testing, whether or not you need it, just because the doctor says it's time. I'm turning 40 in a month. My doc says it's time to get a mammogram. Nope. Not until I feel I need to. I have a very low chance of getting breast cancer, so why pay the doctor for testing I don't need?
In your case Dawg, the testing is done. Look at the results, change what you need to, then get retested in March to see how the numbers have changed for the better
 
Keep in mind, the more tests he does, the more money he makes from your insurance. A lot of people don't realize that. They will do all sorts of testing, whether or not you need it, just because the doctor says it's time. I'm turning 40 in a month. My doc says it's time to get a mammogram. Nope. Not until I feel I need to. I have a very low chance of getting breast cancer, so why pay the doctor for testing I don't need?
In your case Dawg, the testing is done. Look at the results, change what you need to, then get retested in March to see how the numbers have changed for the better
Thankfully he never really pushes stuff or whatever, he actually like barely does hah I get blood work every year at the physical but I hadn’t had a full panel in a while, I thought I had been. I had to insist on the sugar thing, like to get the labs. So idk. I would have thought he’d want to make more? But I guess he figured since the physical was in March he would test then but I was trying to replace the physical/get seen sooner but it was weird but yeah. He usually only does actually necessary stuff which is why I like him, like when I was due for the heart thing in April, and I’ve had a few pelvic ultrasounds, not really sure why, but I think I have liquid in one and also I was having pain at one point so he ordered another but I would have preferred like a scan of the abdomen or something not another pelvic thing since it wasn’t there but yah idk. Saying all this, I’m realizing that he’s almost kinda the opposite with testing and doing too little so I feel like I need a new doctor. Or at least one that actually tells me stuff. I found out stuff about the tests years ago that I never knew till I joined this chart thing last month. I feel like they should be telling me things
 
way down a rabbit hole discussing the similarities of sugar addition and responses of drugs in the body
I read the book, The Case Against Sugar. Very eye opening!

About advocating for your own care... I ask for hard copy print outs of my labs at my yearly check up. Another good book is, Your Blood Never Lies. It goes past what the "normal" range is on a lot of the numbers, and tells you what the range actually means. If I don't get the total print out, I'll just get a phone call with someone telling me, "Yup, everything's fine." I'll ask for the cholesterol specifics, and get a repeat, "they're all good."

I used to get much more specific answers. :rolleyes:

I know someone who was very concerned about his lead exposure at work. He had it tested, was told it was fine. Asked for the number, and was told it was 80, it was fine. He told the person to tell that to the doctor. The doctor called him back in five minutes to tell him to come back to discuss how they were going to deal with that.
 
I'm not going to point fingers, but if you pay for water in a single serve... I'll stop there. How are you alive? What fluid do you imbibe? We spend insane amounts of money to clean and filter water, why pay more to drink some other cities municipal supply? Why support a company that decided to profit off of a natural aquifer? Filter your own tap water. It's simple, you worried about pharmaceutical contamination? Charcoal filter. Everything else is covered by a Berkey system. I can't grasp buying single serve plastic water from Jersey (aquafina).
End rant.

At least one place that is doing this is because it is really good water. You cannot filter your tap water and make it come out as good as this water comes straight out of the ground.

Don't get me wrong, I do not buy any bottled drinking water.
We have great water from our 160 foot well…no chemicals.
When the city lake turned over in the spring rainy season the city water tasted and smelled nasty! The school staff in my wing would ask me to bring gallon jugs of water for them to drink.
 
We have great water from our 160 foot well…no chemicals.
When the city lake turned over in the spring rainy season the city water tasted and smelled nasty! The school staff in my wing would ask me to bring gallon jugs of water for them to drink.
Doesn't get much better, maybe an Alpine spring if you live in the mountains? I think a lot of people forget that we get a lot of minerals from our water, so a process like reverse osmosis is great at removing bacteria, but it makes the water taste flat and robs you of the good stuff.
 
Keep in mind, the more tests he does, the more money he makes from your insurance. A lot of people don't realize that. They will do all sorts of testing, whether or not you need it, just because the doctor says it's time. I'm turning 40 in a month. My doc says it's time to get a mammogram. Nope. Not until I feel I need to. I have a very low chance of getting breast cancer, so why pay the doctor for testing I don't need?
And mammograms are not the only option, a sonogram is less painful and has less false alarms. It's old technology now.
 
Forgive the ignorance, what's the difference? I saw a screening on Grey's anatomy but that's it.
A mammogram presses breast tissue ad flat as possible between two plates, then they take an x-ray. A sonogram can be performed with a wand and some gel, it uses sound waves and a computer creates the image based off how the waves bounce back off tissues. It's more accurate when regarding density, so you can avoid unnecessary exploratory surgery. A mammogram just shows shadows, a sonogram can look at each level of tissue so a fluid filled cyst (which are common and related to hormonal cycles) is easy to differentiate from an abnormal growth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom