For those of us who have been breeding waterfowl longer than just recently, the given story of the origin of the Ancona duck is far, far from "commonly believed to be true". It was I believe the Nazis who realized that if you repeat something enough times, it begins to be taken as fact. We have several breeds for which we have no proven origins, only fanciful stories which don't make sense, such as the African, the Cayuga and the East Indie. Irregardless of their actual origin, these breeds have been around long enough that there is no doubt that they are now legitimate breeds in their own right. Why would anyone in this day and age NOT want the truth about the origin of a breed if it were available?  These Anconas are the only breed that either has no documented history, or is not claimed to be of recent origin. All other breeds have one or the other, even breeds which many of you have never heard of, which are not found in the US. The similarity of Anconas to mismarked Magpies is too close to ignore, especially when you take into account several other circumstances surrounding their early promotion. All I'm asking is for people to think about why there is one, and only one, person who has ever claimed to see the Ancona duck documented prior to the time that he started selling them on a commercial scale. I'm not on a mission to disprove the origins of the Ancona duck, I'm on a mission to PROVE it.