Quote:
Nope, they were made with BR Males and New Hamp females. The SOP calls them sports but in the true sense of a sport....they did not just pop out of a true breed. The popped out of a cross. (The bantams just showed up from sports in BR bantams..no cross). The large were made. The large fowl "sports" lacked the black extension, so I guess in a broad sense they could be called sports. That is just not what I think of as a "sport" though.
I'm kind of rambling here because I am thinking as I type and that can be dangerous. I am also adding my opinion, which is also dangerous.
So..bottom line.. if you make that cross SOME of the offspring will lack the black extension and will have a lot of white. Those are the birds that make the Del.
Walt
So what is the answer? Could that it be much worse than adding light sussex or coumbian? mostly unrealted birds except slightly similar color. I just read an article where one of the heritage breeding farms was working on correcting the barring in the tails, darkening the barring and working to eliminate the washed greys and lightness...How bad can it be to add a little of the foundation stock back into the breed..Australian breeders did it with australorps they were deliberate and knew what they were after...they re-introduced the cooper type blk orps to reduce tail size and give the birds a better curved shape back on the great bird of curves...granted not a color breed like dels...So Im just asking wouldnt it strengthen slightly the critically endangered del breed that according to a few breeders Ive talked to seem to go infertal younger than some other breeds..It just sounds like the whole thing kind of needs a shot in the arm , but not a breed that just looks similar color a delaware in color.
Boy if you ever judge a show walt, your not going to take this breed lightly are you..LOL
Nope, they were made with BR Males and New Hamp females. The SOP calls them sports but in the true sense of a sport....they did not just pop out of a true breed. The popped out of a cross. (The bantams just showed up from sports in BR bantams..no cross). The large were made. The large fowl "sports" lacked the black extension, so I guess in a broad sense they could be called sports. That is just not what I think of as a "sport" though.
I'm kind of rambling here because I am thinking as I type and that can be dangerous. I am also adding my opinion, which is also dangerous.
So..bottom line.. if you make that cross SOME of the offspring will lack the black extension and will have a lot of white. Those are the birds that make the Del.
Walt
So what is the answer? Could that it be much worse than adding light sussex or coumbian? mostly unrealted birds except slightly similar color. I just read an article where one of the heritage breeding farms was working on correcting the barring in the tails, darkening the barring and working to eliminate the washed greys and lightness...How bad can it be to add a little of the foundation stock back into the breed..Australian breeders did it with australorps they were deliberate and knew what they were after...they re-introduced the cooper type blk orps to reduce tail size and give the birds a better curved shape back on the great bird of curves...granted not a color breed like dels...So Im just asking wouldnt it strengthen slightly the critically endangered del breed that according to a few breeders Ive talked to seem to go infertal younger than some other breeds..It just sounds like the whole thing kind of needs a shot in the arm , but not a breed that just looks similar color a delaware in color.
Boy if you ever judge a show walt, your not going to take this breed lightly are you..LOL
Last edited: