Quote:
Wow, do you EVER have anything positive to say?
I would like to know how you know that Christian artists are only hoping to make the next big hit. Do you know any personally? Do you know them ALL personally? I didn't think so...
Well, let's just look at the numbers. It took hundreds of years to write the 4 or 500 hymns, which are in most main stream Christian hymnals....In the last 30 years, how many thousands have been cranked out. There is no serious thought going into the writing of the notes, and as I said, as long as there is a homogenous mix of the proper catch words and phrases, it gets thrown into the market.
I go to church, on occasion, and I can tell you that trying to sing some of the modern songs do not lend themselves to hymnal type singing.
I'm not trying to trash the thread. I'm simply making an observation. That is the problem, today, which was mentioned in another thread. We can no longer call a spade a spade, without having some kind of label put on us.
But can you say that these new artists love God any less, through their different music, than did the monks or preachers who wrote the old hymns? No. They just have a different way of expressing it. And yes, there are certain words or phrases that are repeated. Why? Because sometimes, those are the only words that can truly convey the beauty and majesty and perfect love of God. Not all songs are the same, sir. In different contexts, a Gregorian chant Pater Noster would be more appropriate than Matt Maher's "Alive Again," which is a song of thanksgiving. And sometimes the opposite is true. Modern does not equal bad.