ARE THESE ARAUCANA

[HAPPYCHICKENLADY17]

THEY ARE 2 WEEKS OLD...TO EARLY TO TELL PULLET OR COCKEREL???? THANKS FOR YOUR HELP

 

[Trish1974]

No, those are not Araucanas. I also think they are too young to sex. Where did you get them?

 

[sourland]

Not Araucanas, and possibly not even Easter Eggers. Were they purchased as Araucanas?

 

[HAPPYCHICKENLADY17]

No, those are not Araucanas. I also think they are too young to sex. Where did you get them?

i got them at rual king and the girl said they were araucanas and they would lay blue eggs....

 

[EggWalrus]

Tails are a bit large for Araucanas.
Araucanas usually a have a teenie tiny booty if they have one at all. That's why they're called tailess.

 

[HAPPYCHICKENLADY17]

Not Araucanas, and possibly not even Easter Eggers. Were they purchased as Araucanas?

any clue what they might be????

 

[EggWalrus]

Since they could have gotten put in the wrong bin at RK, there ain't no dang telling what they could be.

 

[sourland]

any clue what they might be????

Even with the light colored legs, I would guess that they MIGHT be Easter Eggers.

 

[HAPPYCHICKENLADY17]

Even with the light colored legs, I would guess that they MIGHT be Easter Eggers.

i just

Even with the light colored legs, I would guess that they MIGHT be Easter Eggers.

i just googled baby chicks araucana and my babies look just like that

 

[Trish1974]

Tails are a bit large for Araucanas.
Araucanas usually a have a teenie tiny booty if they have one at all. That's why they're called tailess.

There should be no tail at all on a true Araucana, not even a small one. The proper term is rumpless, indicating not only a lack of a tail but also lack of a tailbone.