I hate to toss cold water, but what most HOA residents are forgetting is that when they got their home, they signed a contract...a legally binding agreement between them and the HOA, to abide by the existing rules of that neighborhood. Once the buyer's name went on that contract, they became legally obligated to follow those rules, even if the buyer decides later that he/she doesn't like certain ones. If the HOA changes their regs to allow backyard chickens that's terrific, and good for them for being willing to allow it. But if the contract the homeowner signed outlines what is and what is not permitted in the HOA's it doesn't matter which governmental entity passes a law allowing chickens, because the HOA contract is a legally binding contract between two parties, not between the homeowner and the city, county, township or state. I'd like to see HOAs brought down a peg myself, especially when I see things like a homeowner being sued or forced out because he flies a flag or likes a particular flowering bush in his yard...I think they encroach way too much on individuality and on personal rights....but once the buyer signed that contract then that buyer basically said, "You are right, I agree with every restriction and requirement in here, and here's my signature to promise my obedience." So I love it when people are willing to put themselves on the line and change things within the HOA. I don't like it when people sign a contract to do something and then whine or sneak behind the authorities' backs thinking they are within their rights. What happened to someone's word (or signature) being his bond? If you don't like what's contained in an agreement, don't sign it and look for another place to live. Would you sign a contract to buy a car if the contract told you what time you could drive it, where you had to park it, and who had the authority to look into it to see what kind of condition it was in?