- Nov 4, 2014
- 166
- 85
- 196
Thank you, NagemTX, you Dragon Chicken! 
The chart that I found from the "Ameraucana Allegiance" (link above) appears to be beyond outdated. Most people listed under the bantam section have either stopped breeding or have simply vanished altogether. At least, I couldn't find them.
Following that, it seems that (re: bantam Ameraucanas), GypsyHen is the last 1 standing. At least according to that chart. If you know of others, please share them with me, because when you are lauding her exhibition victories, it does make me wonder how large the competition is and whether 1 breeder dominating the market is... oh well, I don't know... a good thing? But since I have never been to the large shows I really have no knowledge on the size of the gene-pool re: the bantam Ameraucana variety.
You say that things are in flux and, yes, they totally are. Our DNA isn't written in stone either...
Breeding programs progress and have setbacks, SoPs shift (sometimes to catch up with new trends and or simply reality [like inbreeding or a woefully limited gene-pool leading to congenital defects etc.]) and so everything swings back & forth. All totally cool. However, dear commercial breeders, when you have a bantam that doesn't lay 'pretty blue eggs' and that looks like a Belgian - for the love of the breed you are trying to foster, do not call them by a name whose (current) SoP they are not (yet) representing. It just muddles the water for other (often hobby) breeders IMO. Maybe call that bantam a Work-in-process-Ameraucana, or an I-am-almost-there-Ameraucana or, what knitters call a UFO (UnFinished Object) Ameraucana. As the one on the receiving end (the buyer/customer of a 'product' from your commercial hatchery), I just want clarity.

The chart that I found from the "Ameraucana Allegiance" (link above) appears to be beyond outdated. Most people listed under the bantam section have either stopped breeding or have simply vanished altogether. At least, I couldn't find them.
Following that, it seems that (re: bantam Ameraucanas), GypsyHen is the last 1 standing. At least according to that chart. If you know of others, please share them with me, because when you are lauding her exhibition victories, it does make me wonder how large the competition is and whether 1 breeder dominating the market is... oh well, I don't know... a good thing? But since I have never been to the large shows I really have no knowledge on the size of the gene-pool re: the bantam Ameraucana variety.
You say that things are in flux and, yes, they totally are. Our DNA isn't written in stone either...

Breeding programs progress and have setbacks, SoPs shift (sometimes to catch up with new trends and or simply reality [like inbreeding or a woefully limited gene-pool leading to congenital defects etc.]) and so everything swings back & forth. All totally cool. However, dear commercial breeders, when you have a bantam that doesn't lay 'pretty blue eggs' and that looks like a Belgian - for the love of the breed you are trying to foster, do not call them by a name whose (current) SoP they are not (yet) representing. It just muddles the water for other (often hobby) breeders IMO. Maybe call that bantam a Work-in-process-Ameraucana, or an I-am-almost-there-Ameraucana or, what knitters call a UFO (UnFinished Object) Ameraucana. As the one on the receiving end (the buyer/customer of a 'product' from your commercial hatchery), I just want clarity.

Last edited: