- Jan 30, 2009
- 2,621
- 121
- 251
Quote:
I was going by the older version that was dated July 2010 and it noted luster in a few places. Bev made mention once that some luster should be on the bird and yes, it was my understanding that luster and the green beetle sheen are one in the same. Hope if I am wrong that someone will correct me.
Kim, the way they describe the standard I do not believe Lustrous means green, it just means brilliant color that they are referring to. It is mentioned in several places talking about different colors.
This Proposed Standard looks pretty good to me and should go through without any other changes. I would not worry about the green sheen as this is all covered in the cutting for points section of the SOP, I do not know of an APA judge that would DQ or deduct for geeen on the BC. Don
Don I thought you would like it! It addresses the other things you didn't like before.
I was going by the older version that was dated July 2010 and it noted luster in a few places. Bev made mention once that some luster should be on the bird and yes, it was my understanding that luster and the green beetle sheen are one in the same. Hope if I am wrong that someone will correct me.

Kim, the way they describe the standard I do not believe Lustrous means green, it just means brilliant color that they are referring to. It is mentioned in several places talking about different colors.
This Proposed Standard looks pretty good to me and should go through without any other changes. I would not worry about the green sheen as this is all covered in the cutting for points section of the SOP, I do not know of an APA judge that would DQ or deduct for geeen on the BC. Don
Don I thought you would like it! It addresses the other things you didn't like before.