The post I liked was the one that used the term 'marketing' in there application of 'heritage.'
To think that non-standard birds are not 'heritage' simply because they aren't in the Standard is the thing I still find the most laugable about all that is in that definition. Of course, I find other things laughable in it as well. Which is why I don't use the word in anything I write anymore.... especially those things that are published.
To think that non-standard birds are not 'heritage' simply because they aren't in the Standard is the thing I still find the most laugable about all that is in that definition. Of course, I find other things laughable in it as well. Which is why I don't use the word in anything I write anymore.... especially those things that are published.
Last edited: