Actually bock, the UKC is a legitimate registry that has been around nearly as long as the AKC. Many people even feel that the UKC is "better" because they are a little bit more "performance" oriented than "conformation" oriented and a lot of people consider their performance events (such as Agility, earth dog, weight pull, obedience, etc) to be at least as challenging if not more so than AKC performance events. Many UKC dogs are also AKC registered. I think the scam registry you are thinking of is the CKC, which in newspaper classifieds almost always stands for Continental Kennel Club, often easily confused for the totally legitimate Canadian Kennel Club (also abbreviated CKC).
Personally I wouldn't have much of a problem with people paying 1200 for a mixed breed "designer dog" if the breeders of these dogs were doing all of the health and temperament testing that a responsible breeder of purebred dogs was doing. After all, hip, elbow, eye, joint, heart, and thyroid testing isn't cheap and I don't have a problem with people offsetting the costs of running these tests on the parents by charging more than a few hundred dollars for a puppy. Not to mention the cost of high quality dog food for the dam and litter to provide optimal nutrition. But the fact of the matter is that these "breeders" are not doing anything different from the other BYB that sells their poorly bred yorkies, german shepherds, labs, or shih tzus for $300 in the paper other than slapping a cutesy name on their puppies and claiming that they are "hybrids." And people keep buying their dogs, and their stories that a lab mated with a poodle will make a new breed known as a labradoodle and that these dogs will somehow be free of the common health problems that cripple both breeds because of "hybrid vigor," because they don't bother to educate themselves before they get a pet.
It really doesn't surprise me at all that so many people honest-to-goodness really believe that if you take two breeds and mate them that you then have a new breed. After all, since both parents were purebred, logic dictates that the puppies are purebred too (even though they are a cross between two different breeds). After all, I used to be surprised at the number of people who came into the vet where I work and thought that their dog didn't have heartworms because we didn't see any evidence of worms in the stool sample. All they really latch onto is the "worm" part of the term Heartworm, they somehow totally overlook the "heart" part which would make them wonder why they are called Heartworms if they live in the GI tract. Same thing with "designer" breeds, people latch onto the idea that the parents are "purebred" and somehow fail to stop and think that a dog is no longer purebred when the parents are not the same breed.
Oops, your right. I'm too tired today! Thanks for catching that one.
