Yeah, I just think it's annoying how many publications aimed at newb steaders tout this or that breed as 'perfect' or 'dual-purpose' and the almost never are. At least not how they are currently bred, and not for people who actually grow their own food instead of collecting animals. It's like the authors read the old pre-industrial farm pamphlets and copy text into current articles. I suppose that sells magazines, rather than practical pieces about how to choose the right animals for particular situations, not just going by pretty breed pictures.
I can't wait to get to the point where I can fine tune for length/onset of molt, start of lay, etc. A few decades ago I bred a few different species of exotic finches. It was fun and educational and rewarding to see how much improvement I could add to my lines. But ultimately extremely impractical. I made money, but it was just a hobby. With chickens I get the same challenges, make a little money, but mainly I love improving my household's food supply and budget. We can eat our 'mistakes'
It is frustrating, and down right misleading. Usually written by someone that does not know any better. The interest in poultry has increased suddenly, and many of the "experts" writing this stuff is new to them to.
Even reputable sites have misleading information. For example, I was reading the description of Catalanas by the ALBC. To me, having them, it comes across as being written by someone that has never raised them. In fact they have broke all of the rules that I had come "to know". I had one picture I my mind, and found an animal much different than my picture.
I spent a long time looking for the real thing, because they are as rare as any breed that we have. Many thought they were gone. I wanted to locate them because of the rarity, and the challenge appealed to me. If I would have went by their reputation, I would have never tried. Fortunately, I was pleasantly surprised.
Good dual purpose birds are the hardest to locate. To have them, is to take on a project. A project to get them where they should be. That is not as bad for someone that is committed to a particular breed. I think it is terrible for a breeds reputation. Many try a breed based on their historic reputation, only to find that they are not what they should be. They are turned off by the breed, and go elsewhere.
I would like to see more people pick one and try to get them where they should be.
I prefer to hear someone describe their birds honestly. Noting the good and the bad. Then someone can make a good decision about whether or not the birds are right for them.
One of the first things we learn in poultry is to set aside a breed's reputation and get familiar with individual strains. They are not all the same. Sometimes we find something we like in one, and something that we like in another. Crossing strains is not blasphemy like some would make it. It certainly is not always wise, but with good selection it can be a plus in the long run. Many of these breeds need to be "rebuilt", concerning production.
As far as selection it helps to get the criteria organized on paper to start. It is easy, because you do not do it all at once. Just seasonally throughout the year. There is no pressure, because they are your layers. You only get rid of your non producers along the way. If the information is recorded, it is easier to decide who is selected to produce the next generation.
I like having a generation of pullets and hens anyways. I have eggs while the hens are molting and get more winter eggs.
I like being able to eat my mistakes to.