You assume that I am upset with you. I am not. You have simply not shown me evidence of why you are adamant that some sort of stress is not a cause. You and I both know that for every study out there, you will find one or more studies that contradict the first study. It's up to the individual person to determine what information holds merit and then they can act accordingly . I know what I have found in my research and have made an opinion based on that information, as you obviously have based on your research.
You assume that I am upset with you. I am not. You have simply not shown me evidence of why you are adamant that some sort of stress is not a cause. You and I both know that for every study out there, you will find one or more studies that contradict the first study. It's up to the individual person to determine what information holds merit and then they can act accordingly . I know what I have found in my research and have made an opinion based on that information, as you obviously have based on your research.
LOL. I never said that I thought you were upset with me. Where was that at?
The burden of proof, as I stated, is to prove that stress causes blood spots. Not the other way around. It doesn't work that way. Anyone can make any wild claim that is hypothetical and say prove me wrong.
Speculation is not evidence. It is assuming that it could be a cause. I provided evidence and a demonstration on how blood spots are made. Please show me how stress causes this to happen. I did my part, and produced evidence. I would like to see the evidence that you are referring to. I could be convinced otherwise, and I like to learn. You have known me long enough to know that I need more than because someone says so. I am a doubting Thomas. Now, if evidence is provided, I would have appreciated learning something new.
The good thing about having been shown to be wrong, is that I would not have to continue being wrong.
I enjoy debating, but not chickens. They are not that complicated. LOL. Not to mention that this is not a good format for it. I have some friends that I debate a couple subjects with online. They are not arguments, and it is among friends. Every now and then, I have to concede a point, and I learn something. I always benefit from that exchange. I do not gain from what I already have. It is what I do not have that I need and want. That is why we do it. We are all pushed and challenged.
Now the good thing about this discussion between you and I is that anyone that bothers to watch the video will see how blood spots are made. If you can provide your evidence, then they will have learned even more. I would have myself.