My hen, Maude, has bumblefoot on both feet for the second time. About this time last year she got it for the first time. The last time it wasn't as bad as this, but I removed the scabs and treated with tricide-neo and it did the trick. Since then, I have learned that if there isn't any redness, swelling, or heat, then removing the scab may not be the best idea because that means there is no infection. I'm hesitant about that advice because when she first got bumblefoot there was never any redness, heat, or swelling, but the scabs did get bigger in the few days while I was waiting for the tricide-neo. But I'll go ahead and ask what would be the best course for her current bumblefoot.
There is no heat, redness, or swelling, but the scabs are bigger than last time. Should I go ahead with my usual treatment of removing the scab and using tricide-neo and all that, or would something less invasive be best? I'm wary about not treating bumblefoot aggressively because it could get worse and could get harder to treat.
There is no heat, redness, or swelling, but the scabs are bigger than last time. Should I go ahead with my usual treatment of removing the scab and using tricide-neo and all that, or would something less invasive be best? I'm wary about not treating bumblefoot aggressively because it could get worse and could get harder to treat.