**Casey Anthony Verdict In ..**

[welsummerchicks]

Quote:
That's what it boils down to. Evidence is what's needed to convict.

Scott Peterson was convicted based on compelling circumstantial evidence.

This is not the Scott Peterson case. And aside from that, the Scott Peterson case had an awful lot more and better quality information than this case. This case was just a nightmare.

 

[Dar]

Quote:
can they do that?.. I know in Canada she would not be able to... her parents would but she would not be... (sorry there are major differences between the laws here and there)

 

[welsummerchicks]

Additionally, given the unified response from the jury (they do NOT WANT TO TALK TO THE MEDIA), they do not want to be the target of the rage and dismay and anger that - that a ridiculous media coverage of this case has created.

This sort of irresponsible media coverage is what gets jurors killed. All those guys did was their job. They did the BEST THEY COULD. THEY HAD NOTHING. NOTHING.

Idiots. The whole lot of them - Nancy Grace and her entire ilk.

 

[Carols Clucks]

Sad thing is she will be free at a young enough age to have more children.



My guess is after she write the tell all book flaming her parents (And no I don't think they did anything wrong)

And makes more money working the stripper pole

She will be all over the news with her latest transgression looking for more attention.



And Nancy Grace will have another 6 months of shows to do on the horrors of this trial before she find her next big case to cover (not a Nancy Grace fan)

 

[prairiehen74369]

I can't believe the verdict so sorry that there's no justice for that sweet little girl. Maybe we missed something here...... it seems there has to be more to this story.

 

[Dar]

Quote:
there is SOOO much information that is not released to the public or to the jury.. I have seen it first hand.. a child sex predator walked away free in October2010 because the jury were not ALLOWED to hear the whole story.

 

[cafarmgirl]

Quote:
Scott Peterson was convicted based on compelling circumstantial evidence.

This is not the Scott Peterson case. And aside from that, the Scott Peterson case had an awful lot more and better quality information than this case. This case was just a nightmare.

Yes, I KNOW this is not the Scott P. case. My point was just that there can be convictions based on compelling circumstantial evidence and there seemed to certainly be an awful lot of that in the Casey Anthony case.

 

[babylady4]

They did not provide the 'smoking gun' so to speak, that would link her to this crime. All they had was a lot of forensic evidence on how the baby was killed, but nothing concrete to tie in to the mom. If I was a Juror on this case I would not have been able to find her guilty of murder: too many doubts no matter what the media says. It was the same thing with OJ.......


I feel so badly for that little girl.........

 

[halo]

It was proven without a shadow of a doubt she is those things, but there was no proof, not even close, of her killing this child. There is no evidence, no DNA, no smoking gun. She ran with a bad crowd, maybe her drug dealer had something to do with it? Maybe it was indeed an accident, and she was influenced by her crackhead friends to hide the body. Maybe her crackhead friends hid the body? Who knows? Thats the whole point, even after 6 weeks of testimony, theres still no answers. Im not saying Im entirely happy with it, other than I am happy that the system did work, and you are presumed innocent unless proven guilty.

Dont get me wrong, I fully believe she had something to do with it, but that isnt enough to get her convicted of murder or manslaughter.

Kudos to the jury for doing the right, if difficult, thing.

 

[Dar]

Quote:
was the forensic team able to determing a cause of death?.. last I heard it was inconclusive