Ridgerunner,
I've seen both kinds of studies. Day 1 high calcium was devastating, as one might imagine. Other studies have had two groups. At age 15 weeks, 4.5% calcium layer is fed while in group 2, the diet was a continuation of 1.5% calcium. The studies were conducted in hopes of finding that early onset of 4.5% calcium was a benefit to the layer in "pre-building" calcium that would be useable during lay from week 20-50, roughly. The results were somewhat inconclusive. Thus, the layer industry is somewhat divided, as I understand it, in applying the results. Personally, I didn't buy into it's advantage. There was nothing to convince me and too much to dissuade me.
What seems much more clear is advantage of delaying POL for two weeks. This allows the pullet's organ and weight to develop and everything I've seen has shown this to be extraordinarily beneficial to the long term health and well-being of the bird.
As you can tell, I may be older,
but I am a reader, a researcher and an educator, both by profession and by disposition. Still, common sense has to rule the day.
I've seen both kinds of studies. Day 1 high calcium was devastating, as one might imagine. Other studies have had two groups. At age 15 weeks, 4.5% calcium layer is fed while in group 2, the diet was a continuation of 1.5% calcium. The studies were conducted in hopes of finding that early onset of 4.5% calcium was a benefit to the layer in "pre-building" calcium that would be useable during lay from week 20-50, roughly. The results were somewhat inconclusive. Thus, the layer industry is somewhat divided, as I understand it, in applying the results. Personally, I didn't buy into it's advantage. There was nothing to convince me and too much to dissuade me.
What seems much more clear is advantage of delaying POL for two weeks. This allows the pullet's organ and weight to develop and everything I've seen has shown this to be extraordinarily beneficial to the long term health and well-being of the bird.
As you can tell, I may be older,