Quote:
You've hit on a characteristic that is common on many lines of Cochin bantams and a flaw that is tough to overcome. You do want the wings tucked up as high as you can get them. The females tend to be better in this department than the males and some varieties have better wings than others. The key to making progress in the wing department is to look at the wing feather length. The longer the primaries and secondaries the greater the potential for lower carried wings. The females tend to have shorter wings because generally speaking they are smaller and more compact than the males. Something else that can be a factor is that just by the way a Cochin is put together they aren't much in the flying department. Getting them to roost even if the roost is 12 - 14 inches off the ground forces them to use their wing muscles. You want some snap in the wing of a Cochin, not so much as a game, but you don't want it to be sloppy when you open the wing. Of course there isn't much you can do for genetically poor wing carriage, except breed away from it.
Could you explain "snap in the wing" . I'm unfamiliar with the terminology. And, is this a LF problem also?
It sounds like he's talking about the muscle development of the wings - great suggestion about making sure that roosts are up - even a little bit. With better muscle development of the wings, when you open them, they will "snap" back into place - the muscle development helps them hold them higher and tighter. Lack of muscle development can cause the wings to hang lower, as the muscles are looser (sloppy). Kind of like a spring or coil that snaps back into place after being stretched out, versus one that is weak and when stretched out, remains limp and doesn't "snap" back into place.
You've hit on a characteristic that is common on many lines of Cochin bantams and a flaw that is tough to overcome. You do want the wings tucked up as high as you can get them. The females tend to be better in this department than the males and some varieties have better wings than others. The key to making progress in the wing department is to look at the wing feather length. The longer the primaries and secondaries the greater the potential for lower carried wings. The females tend to have shorter wings because generally speaking they are smaller and more compact than the males. Something else that can be a factor is that just by the way a Cochin is put together they aren't much in the flying department. Getting them to roost even if the roost is 12 - 14 inches off the ground forces them to use their wing muscles. You want some snap in the wing of a Cochin, not so much as a game, but you don't want it to be sloppy when you open the wing. Of course there isn't much you can do for genetically poor wing carriage, except breed away from it.
Could you explain "snap in the wing" . I'm unfamiliar with the terminology. And, is this a LF problem also?
It sounds like he's talking about the muscle development of the wings - great suggestion about making sure that roosts are up - even a little bit. With better muscle development of the wings, when you open them, they will "snap" back into place - the muscle development helps them hold them higher and tighter. Lack of muscle development can cause the wings to hang lower, as the muscles are looser (sloppy). Kind of like a spring or coil that snaps back into place after being stretched out, versus one that is weak and when stretched out, remains limp and doesn't "snap" back into place.