Haha I was just wondering if someone created a "speckled" cornish.. what would they call it? How about a dark laced orp with I added?
Those patterns in general are not my thing so haven't really read up on their genetics. It IS a hoot from what I've seen though! btw- my similar peeve is how the name Crele gets abused- you mentioned Tolbunts, that reminded me of how it really chaps me to see "Crele Polish"- barring on either gold lace or just randomly bred/poorly patterned birds. No.. just no....... lol
I would have to agree...what are you to call something once the "traditional" label has been hijacked to explain something that it should not.
If you want to gain a headache...look at the hobby terms Porcelain, Isabel, and Mille Fleur...totally opposite meanings, from place to place. I mean, we should as a worldwide poultry community, decide which label should mean the addition of the genetic mutation of lav/lav and which is not. My head begins to hurt about here...
In the past, the Standards have been a bit off in naming breeds by variety and traits. Yeh, what to do with the BLUE "Buff" Duck (1914), the GOLD "Silver" Appleyard Duck (2000), the PIED "Buff" American Geese (1947), the NON-Tufted "Tufted" Roman Geese (1977), the NON-Saddlebacked "Saddleback" Pomeranian Geese (1977), the NOT-WHITE FACED "White Faced" Black Spanish (1874)...and what to do about the White Faced WHITE "Black" Spanish chickens (1874).
We have learned nothing much if the Appleyard was recognized as recently as 2000! Another breed with a colour variety of Silver IN the name! Few years back, I showed a Crested Silver Appleyard to an utterly mystified sanctioned judge. The crested variety is recognized in England...the country of origin. What was even more frightful...the show staff had the Appleyard breed listed in the MEDIUM class...it is a HEAVY Classed duck as per the APA SOP.
Why are the Rhode Island chickens two different BREEDS...the White (1922) and the Red (1904-single comb / 1905-rose comb)...those should be varieties within the breed, not breeds segregated by themselves.
Why are there only FEMALE Wheaten Shamos (1996) in the APA SOP but both genders in the ABA SOP... it has been a while since the girls got recognized. Maybe that is in the works...I grow tired of trying to keep pace with all this.
No, if you want to get thoroughly confused...try to make sense out of hobby names and the listings of "names" in the Standards...
I did get to learn something "new" yesterday, Friday the 13th, eh...we are not doing the genetic colourations any justice any more than we are even following what the hobby names are said to be, as described in the worded descriptions of the SOP's of the countries involved.
So glad I do not have to take any of this too seriously, eh. I just laugh, shrug and go, "Yeh...go figure eh...??" The more we know, the more we know nothing is carved in stone.
Doggone & Chicken UP!
Tara Lee Higgins
Higgins Rat Ranch Conservation Farm, Alberta, Canada