Now, to turn things around again...
I've become familiar with the "wanting an animal without doing research" thing coming up a lot on the Cage Bird area here. There have been posts from people asking about where to get fertile eggs to hatch their own parrots/finches/softbills/etc because the birds are too expensive to buy as weaned babies or adults. "Oh, I've hatched chickens and ducks and guineafowl...so now I want to try using my incubator to hatch some Palm Cockatoos. Does anyone know where I can get eggs shipped?"
A further clue that a person familiar with poultry thinks that will translate seamlessly into the world of parrots/finches/softbills -- referring to different parrots/finches/softbills as "breeds" rather than "species." Hint -- there are no "breeds" of parrot. This mentality is, I believe, at the root of the hybridization "controversy" among bird-keepers -- those who come from a poultry background think of them as "breeds" and so think "as long as it LOOKS like it should, so what if it had a hybrid ancestor?" while those from a conservation background recognize hybridization as forever tainting further descendents, even if they "look pure."
Or another one that comes up -- "What species of parrot/finch/softbill can I keep with my chickens in their enclosed run?" Beyond the likelihood of the chickens passing on some disease to the other birds, there's the completely different set of needs each group has. Generally, chickens can get by on much poorer hygiene, crowding and diet than most parrot/finch/softbill species, so sticking the latter in an enclosure designed for the former is an invitation for disease and death. On the other hand, an aviary properly designed and maintained for parrot/finch/softbill species would be a palace for a small number of chickens.
So, how is this controversial? Well, it seems that many people on this forum are convinced that country people are naturally more familiar with animal-keeping than city people are. That may be true if we're talking about livestock -- domesticated species selected over a few thousand years to be able to survive and reproduce on as little care as possible for the purpose of becoming or producing food for us. But take a an animal at most only a couple generations removed from the wild, with more demanding needs, that can't be housed outdoors year-round in most areas of the country, and the story changes. Country people know more about animals? Then why does this city-boy know that 1)
doves can't be used to raise cockatiel babies, even though
many chicken people seem to think they can; 2)
breeders of Bali Mynahs (less than 2,000 world-wide population) are not likely to be found on BYC, a forum based on chicken-keeping; 3) basic Mendelian genetics as learned in high school biology can answer virtually all the
"what will I get?" questions about offspring from various crosses on the peafowl forum, but even the
stickies post on genetics there doesn't get it all right; 4) you're not going to find a breeder of
Palm Cockatoos or
other parrots who will sell you a fertile egg to hatch your own baby so you can save a few bucks; 5) even if you DO find
parrot eggs to incubate, raising the babies is a whole different ball game from raising baby chickens, ducks, guineas, etc. There is virtually nothing to be gained from raising chickens that can be used toward hand-feeding a day-1 baby cockatiel.
So, as I said before, being a country person doesn't make you better than a city person -- and vice versa.
