Coronavirus, Covid 19 Discussion and How It Has Affected Your Daily Life Chat Thread

[saysfaa]

Deleting due to lack of confidence that it is solid informaion

 

[Ninjasquirrel]

Finally!!!!

I did not believe it was a weapon.
It seems it was not.

It was an attempt to prevent the pandemics that might happen from the viruses that periodically cross over from the wild animal reservoir. Such as the first SARS which rightfully scared many people watching this kind of thing. If the relevant viruses could be stopped hy inoculating the bats, they would stop crossing over to people.

And how the author figured it out in the second picture

Description of the proposal in the third picture (by a different author than who wrote the cover letter parts of which are in the first two pictures)

Think it might be possible to remove the watermark on those images? Makes it quite hard to read. Also why does the watermark say "project critical"? Is this from some book?

 

[saysfaa]

Deleting due to lack of confidence it is solid information

 

[bruceha2000]

But if big pharma did their own testing, folks would say they fudged it, faked it, skewed it, lied about it. So they can't win, can they? If outside agencies do the testing nobody can say they had any influence on it. It's independently tested, which sounds like a good thing to me.

It seems that the fox watching the hen house hasn't worked out very well in a number of cases. VW and their diesel scam for one.

Except the CDC now admits that over 75% of deaths were from people with at least 4 comorbidities two thirds had six. Another article from months ago showed the vast majority were at or above life expectancy. So yeah, one foot in the grave, one on a banana peel.

"(Editor's Note: This article has been updated to include additional context and notes that CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky was speaking specifically about COVID-19 deaths among the vaccinated population.)"

So we aren't talking about 75% of 800K deaths but 75% of those who were vaccinated.
HUGE difference.

If the patient didn't have Covid they wouldn't need early treatment, would they?

Nope. But some would rather chase the horse around the field than close the barn door.

 

[Ninjasquirrel]

Transcribed parts of it
From the cover letter
4. I will inevitably be asked how I figured this out and how I discovered the documents. The pandemic response become the predominant focus of my fellowship efforts. DARPA worked a number of pandemic innovations and much of its team was familiar with biodefense. I had the opportunity to “sit in the back row” per se and observe and listen-in on the government’s efforts. My obligation-light fellowship also allowed me to observe and read the field. This observation grew in scope to the point that it became a series of reports, like a military scout would prepare when tasked to investigate a problem.

These reports served as iterative thinking against the problem over many months. Eventually, I arrived at a hypothesis that what leaked from the NIV could be a bat vaccine or its precursor. It was feasible that the US would try to avoid a SARS-COV outbreak by stopping it at its source, not by halting its infections amongst people but by halting the infections amongst the bats. Americans are creative, even if imprudent, and technologically confident enough to try it. This concept seemed to fit within the PREEMPT program construct as well, and DRASTIC had discovered that some earlier specimens witin the USAID PREDICT program were obtained in Africa and sent to the WIV. Moreover, the unusual nature and pathology of the virus hinted that it could be a vaccine or be vaccine-like.

From the supporting documents

This proposal aims to identify and model spillover risk of novel, pandemic-potential SARS-related coronaviruses (SARSr-CoVs) in Asia, focusing specifically on known hotspot bat caves in China.

Skipping about the reasons for selecting this location. Skipping about the people selected. Skipping the financials…

It is called Project DEFUSE: Defusing the Threat of Bat-borne Coronaviruses

Skipping contact info…

Executive Summary
Technical Approach: Our goal is to defuse the potential for spillover of novel bat-origin high-zoonotic risk SARS-related coronaviruses in Asia. Skipping some of how they will do it… We will sequence their spike proteins, reverse engineer them to conduct binding assays, and insert them into bat SARSr-CoV (skipping specific) backbones (these use bat-SARS-CoV backbones, and SARS-CoV, and are exempt frm dual-use and gain of function concerns) to infect humanized mice and assess the capacity to cause SARS-like disease. Skipping more about how

In TA2, we will evaluate two approaches to reduce SARSr-CoV shedding in cave bats: 1) Broadscale Immune boosting, in which we will inoculate bats with immune modulators to skipping stuff 2) Targeted immune boosting, in which we will inoculate bats with novel chimeric polyvalent recombinant spike proteins plus the immune modulator to enhance innate immunity against specific high-risk viruses. We will trial inoculum delivery methods delivery on captive bats including a novel automated aerosolization system, transdermal nanopartical application and edible adhesive gels…

Skipping lots…

We have now published direct evidence of spillover of novel SARSr-CoVs in to people in the Yunnan Province, China, close to a cave complex where we have isolated strains that profuce SARS-like disease in humanized mice but don’t respond to antibody treatment or vaccination. These viruses are a clear-and-present danger to our military and to global health security because of their circulation and evolution in bats and periodic spillover into humans. .... Skipping….

We will design strategies like small molecule skipping to reduce viral shedding and spillover. We will complement this by coupling agonist treatments with SARSr-CoV recombinant spike proteins to boost pre-existing adaptive immune response adult bats against specific, high-risk SARSrCovs. Skipping…

…begins with a complete inventory of bats and their SARSr-CoVs at our intervention test site…..skipping….collect samples…skipping…

The Univ. N. Carolina (UNC) team will reverse-engineer spike proteins of a large sample of high- and low- risk viruses …. These will be synthesized, and those binding to human cell receptor ACE2 will be inserted into SARSr-CoV backbones, and inoculated into humanized mice to assess capacity to cause SARS-CoV.

I"m up to the bottom of first paragraph of page 3.

Who is "I" ? Where is this document from? Seems to me the writer has literally gone bat s*** crazy.

 

[Ninjasquirrel]

"I" is a major in the US Marine Corp.
Program Liaison
That is who wrote the cover letter

The "we" etc is not from the cover letter. It is from the proposal

View attachment 2958331
View attachment 2958334

So call him and ask him. Heres his number:
1-866-243-3887
My understanding is that this specific letter was denied by EcoHealth. In addition I do not believe this to be the actual letter especially since your source says they use the Zekman method. If this is the actual letter and not an inscription of facts it was stolen. Moreover the seal is off kilter. And blurry like someone stuck a low res jpeg on it. The font is "typewriter" not your standard font anymore because we use computers now. Font should be Times New Roman or Minion Pro. In addition government agencies use paper with watermarks. This means the document can not be scanned. I submit you that your "source" (which gets money from the government to operate) can not be trusted and that this piece of "evidence" is fraudulent.

 

[Beer can]

But if big pharma did their own testing, folks would say they fudged it, faked it, skewed it, lied about it. So they can't win, can they? If outside agencies do the testing nobody can say they had any influence on it. It's independently tested, which sounds like a good thing to me.

It sure didn't take them 75yrs to compile the data.

 

[saysfaa]

So call him and ask him. Heres his number:
1-866-243-3887
My understanding is that this specific letter was denied by EcoHealth. In addition I do not believe this to be the actual letter especially since your source says they use the Zekman method. If this is the actual letter and not an inscription of facts it was stolen. Moreover the seal is off kilter. And blurry like someone stuck a low res jpeg on it. The font is "typewriter" not your standard font anymore because we use computers now. Font should be Times New Roman or Minion Pro. In addition government agencies use paper with watermarks. This means the document can not be scanned. I submit you that your "source" (which gets money from the government to operate) can not be trusted and that this piece of "evidence" is fraudulent.

What is the Zekeman method? it is not coming up in a netsearch

"typewriter" is a font? I learned to type on a manual typewriters with several different fonts (don't remember any of their names). The classroom had one electric typewriter with the ball that could be changed out for a ball with a different font - courier was one of the options, I don't remember the others but they had names.

I tried typing a section into Word and changing it to Times New Roman. I can't see the difference. Maybe my eye isn't educated enough.

I had to look up what Minion Pro is. It seems it is a serif font. So is Times New Roman. Here the Department of Defense uses a font that does not have serifs.
https://www.dodig.mil/Reports/Lead-Inspector-General-Reports/

The seal is blurry, as is the rest of the document. Maybe that does mean something besides they probably don't have the original as it is not a very clear copy. It isn't quite round - maybe about the same amount of elongation as the print is from Times New Roman?

 

[Ninjasquirrel]

What is the Zekeman method? it is not coming up in a netsearch

"typewriter" is a font? I learned to type on a manual typewriters with several different fonts (don't remember any of their names). The classroom had one electric typewriter with the ball that could be changed out for a ball with a different font - courier was one of the options, I don't remember the others but they had names.

I tried typing a section into Word and changing it to Times New Roman. I can't see the difference. Maybe my eye isn't educated enough.

I had to look up what Minion Pro is. It seems it is a serif font. So is Times New Roman. Here the Department of Defense uses a font that does not have serifs.
https://www.dodig.mil/Reports/Lead-Inspector-General-Reports/

The seal is blurry, as is the rest of the document. Maybe that does mean something besides they probably don't have the original as it is not a very clear copy. It isn't quite round - maybe about the same amount of elongation as the print is from Times New Roman?

Zekman was a reporter for the chicago sun times. She went so far to uncover "dirt"that she bought a bar and filled it with hidden cameras and microphones. Clearly a proponent of spying on everyone. Won her 2 pulitzers. A simple review of their core values listed on their website shows a clear contradiction. In addition I studied type in college. I know my fonts. Yes typewriter is a font made to mimic the look of an original typewriter. In addition the seal would not be blurry because if it was done on an actual typewriter the paper would have had the seal on it before being inserted to the typewriter. Typewriters are no longer used for one reason: ribbon. Typewriter ribbon can be read to determine exactly what was typed previously. Something your standard keyboard does not do. Plus your margins would look much different. Ive worked in print for some 5 years now and I design crap that looks official a lot.

 

[Beer can]

Zekman was a reporter for the chicago sun times. She went so far to uncover "dirt"that she bought a bar and filled it with hidden cameras and microphones. Clearly a proponent of spying on everyone. Won her 2 pulitzers. A simple review of their core values listed on their website shows a clear contradiction. In addition I studied type in college. I know my fonts. Yes typewriter is a font made to mimic the look of an original typewriter. In addition the seal would not be blurry because if it was done on an actual typewriter the paper would have had the seal on it before being inserted to the typewriter. Typewriters are no longer used for one reason: ribbon. Typewriter ribbon can be read to determine exactly what was typed previously. Something your standard keyboard does not do. Plus your margins would look much different. Ive worked in print for some 5 years now and I design crap that looks official a lot.

Reminds me of a Hardy Boys mystery book.