As I said in the Barnie thread. The SOP can be changed if the Standard Committee receives information that shows there is an error in the SOP. Someone....not me.....has to put together information that clearly shows that there is a mistake in the SOP. This is a good time to do that as we are in a Revision mode at the moment and the Standard Committee is presently called the Standard Revision Committee.
If these two breeds are wrong or if there was a mistake.....as claimed in the Barnevelders, someone has to prove that. Since again we have the British saying the same thing the APA is saying, it may be a bit difficult.....but not impossible.
The way it stands right now is that judges are going to fault shafting unless it is on the back of the bird because shafting is a general fault unless described in the SOP...and the British Standard...maybe in the German Standard as well, but I don't know that.
What does the Dutch Standard say?
Walt
If these two breeds are wrong or if there was a mistake.....as claimed in the Barnevelders, someone has to prove that. Since again we have the British saying the same thing the APA is saying, it may be a bit difficult.....but not impossible.
The way it stands right now is that judges are going to fault shafting unless it is on the back of the bird because shafting is a general fault unless described in the SOP...and the British Standard...maybe in the German Standard as well, but I don't know that.
What does the Dutch Standard say?
Walt