Thanks for the info on the other thread! Would love to check it out! There is a difference between breeding grains and genetically modifying them-- i stand corrected in a sense....it is not gentically modified-- it may be worse. You are right though-- let's get back to
inventions--and not the GMO type!!!! Though I only discussed this because I was asked-- however for the clarification I looked to Dr. William Davis because I am by far not the expert in describing why my body is sensitive to wheat and why I choose to limit it-- For those interested below is a excerpt from him... I am not introducing this in a new thread!!!! It is way to controversial and we all have to do what we each feel is right for ourselves and our families (even if that does include our chickens!
)
"Modern wheat has been hybridized (crossing different strains to generate new characteristics; 5% of proteins generated in the offspring, for instance, are not present in either parent), backcrossed (repeated crossing to winnow out a specific trait, e.g., short stature), and hybridized with non-wheat plants (to introduce entirely unique genes). There are also chemical-, gamma-, and x-ray mutagenesis, i.e., the use of obnoxious stimuli to induce mutations that can then be propagated in offpspring. This is how BASF’s Clearfield wheat was created, for example, by exposing the seeds and embryos to the industrial chemical, sodium azide, that is highly toxic to humans.
By definition, hybridization, backcrossing, and mutation-inducing techniques are difficult to control, unpredictable, and generate plenty of unexpected results. In short, they are worse than genetic-modification. Imagine we were to apply similar techniques of hybridization and mutagenesis to mammals–we’d have all manner of bizarre creatures and genetic freaks on our hands. I am no defender of genetic-modification, but it is pure craziness that Agribusiness apologists defend modern wheat because it is not yet the recipient of “genetic modification.”
Just as Agribusiness is lobbying to prevent truth in labeling that proposes to require food manufacturers to include a “genetically-modified” declaration on foods since they feel it is none of your business, they are likewise muddying the water by defending modern high-yield, semi-dwarf strains of wheat, created through extensive genetics manipulations, as not the product of “genetic modification.”
http://www.wheatbellyblog.com/2012/02/wheat-is-not-genetically-modified/