- Thread starter
- #11
I believe these are broilers, so they'd be sold as meat birds, which I have no problem with, as long as they are properly cared for until the time comes for slaughter. If sold as novelty pets, they may not be lucky enough to get a quick, humane "useful" death. These breeds were not intended to see a full year of life. They also don't deserve to live that life in misery or neglect. People who want good chicken meat take proper care of their meat chickens. I eat meat. I know where it comes from. I have no trouble with this concept.
Again, novelty pets such as colored chicks, ducks and rabbits cause impulse buying BY PEOPLE WHO WOULD OTHERWISE NEVER BUY A CHICKEN, DUCK OR RABBIT, AND THE ANIMALS ARE CONSIDERED DISPOSIBLE PETS. Do you think these folks who just bought a living toy for their child will then slaughter it humanely eight months later? Remember, these are people who would never otherwise have bought it were it not cute and purple.
Why would anyone want to encourage any living creature to be treated as an inanimate object? All of you hatching chicks out there, would you paint yours and drive out to an urban shopping center or suburban Agway and sell them to people on the spot who have never seen a live chicken? Would you at least want to know your chicks were properly cared for even if they were going to be eventually eaten?
Or am I just beating a dead horse here? This was not the response to this post that I had expected. I just spent over an hour following the progress of a double yolked egg hatching in Georgia, and discovered I wasn't the only one. I've followed your agonies over found kittens, neglected dogs, rescued poultry...some of you have stolen animals because you couldn't let them suffer, and you've gone hungry so your animals wouldn't starve. You've expressed compassion for mistreated animals and outrage that any human could be so heartless to treat them in such horrific ways. But no problem with the Crayola-colored chicks? I can't be the only one seeing this connection (well, me and Lurky. Thanks again.)
Down off my soap box now. To work. (Inhale...Exhale...)
Again, novelty pets such as colored chicks, ducks and rabbits cause impulse buying BY PEOPLE WHO WOULD OTHERWISE NEVER BUY A CHICKEN, DUCK OR RABBIT, AND THE ANIMALS ARE CONSIDERED DISPOSIBLE PETS. Do you think these folks who just bought a living toy for their child will then slaughter it humanely eight months later? Remember, these are people who would never otherwise have bought it were it not cute and purple.
Why would anyone want to encourage any living creature to be treated as an inanimate object? All of you hatching chicks out there, would you paint yours and drive out to an urban shopping center or suburban Agway and sell them to people on the spot who have never seen a live chicken? Would you at least want to know your chicks were properly cared for even if they were going to be eventually eaten?
Or am I just beating a dead horse here? This was not the response to this post that I had expected. I just spent over an hour following the progress of a double yolked egg hatching in Georgia, and discovered I wasn't the only one. I've followed your agonies over found kittens, neglected dogs, rescued poultry...some of you have stolen animals because you couldn't let them suffer, and you've gone hungry so your animals wouldn't starve. You've expressed compassion for mistreated animals and outrage that any human could be so heartless to treat them in such horrific ways. But no problem with the Crayola-colored chicks? I can't be the only one seeing this connection (well, me and Lurky. Thanks again.)
Down off my soap box now. To work. (Inhale...Exhale...)