This still sounds a little bit iffy. If I were the OP I would cross only the breeds I know would give me sex-linked chicks for sure.
Actually, it's not as iffy as it sounds.
The really neat thing about sexlinks is you can pick the breeding stock by looking at them, with no need to know their ancestors, just because of how the genes work.
The father must have two copies of the recessive gene (on his two Z chromosomes.)
Because the gene is recessive, he only shows that gene if he does have the two copies you need him to have. So if he looks right, he IS right.
The mother must have one copy of the dominant gene on her only Z chromsome.
Because she only has one Z chromosome, she cannot be hiding anything else. So you just look at her, and see if she's got it or not. Again, if she looks right, she IS right.
Then when you cross them, the daughters get the recessive gene from their father, and they show it.
The sons get the recessive gene from their father and the dominant gene from their mother, so they show the dominant gene, and that's how you know their sex even when they are very young.
What are punnet sqaures? I was playing with genetics and it came up.
A punnett square is a way to show what happens with a particular gene when you cross two animals (or plants or people.)
Some people find it helpful to look at a diagram, instead of reading a bunch of words, so a punnett square is very useful for them.
If you want to read more about how a punnett square is used, here is a page that explains it in a way that seems clear to me:
https://www2.palomar.edu/anthro/mendel/mendel_2.htm
I find that punnett squares are easy to use now that I understand them, but I get badly tangled up if I try to explain them

Oh, and I don't use them for more than one trait at a time. That still confuses me too much.
They're named after Reginald Punnett, who came up with the idea.