- Mar 26, 2013
- 76
- 1
- 31
I usually feel like such a prat for suggesting All This ‘academic’ stuff – but bingo! got ‘triangulation’: formal academic source, on-the-ground captive, on-the-ground wild. Very satisfying.
I know what you mean! Back when my husband was getting his PhD (many years ago) I was really into Estrildid finches. Waxbills, Zebra finches, etc. I had a copy of Derek Goodwin's monograph Estrildid finches of the World and read it cover to cover. He summarized all the descriptive literature to that point, then added his own observations of the birds in his home aviary / greenhouse. He had so much affection for the birds and his observations were scientific and personal at the same time. At that time I was able to keep 6 different species of Estrildid finch and got to hear their calls and see their displays firsthand. The black rumped waxbills were my favorite -- they wove their little nest complete with tube entrance and a decoy nest on top. Just like the book said! Anyway, I agree with you, it's so cool to compare the wild and captive observations. I think the amateurs who get to know birds as individuals are seeing a side of the story that the scientists don't always see.