Quote: WHat pill?????? Maybe it has other side effects so they provide the other as first choice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Quote: WHat pill?????? Maybe it has other side effects so they provide the other as first choice.
I have no idea but apparently there is one because that lady did not leave till the doctor gave her the script.WHat pill?????? Maybe it has other side effects so they provide the other as first choice.
Bee, it would be slower.
It still boils down to hatching a qty. of growers and selection though. I do not think that anyone can logically dispute that.
I think that it is less risky, and a good way for someone to get their feet wet (or stick their toe in the water). The reason is the variability. You haven't put yourself in a corner to start off with. That might go against conventional wisdom, but I still believe that flock mating is not a bad place to start.
The biggest thing us newbies need to learn is selection. Developing an eye for the birds, and becoming familiar with the strengths and weaknesses in our birds. It takes a generation or two to do that when we are new. In the mean time, the added variability might help keep us from getting into too much trouble. At least not to a point of no return. A little more room for error.
Bee-- get there any way you want!! Don't know if I ever shared with you the years of breeding sheep. ALways picking the best of the best which meant all my girls went back to just one or two ewes, and the males were from sons of my rams off new ewes, any way, after about 20 years, I started having lambs with dislocated hips,. Took me into the second lambing season with this issue before Eureka struck: figured it was a double recessive lethal-- with my current stock I was painted into a corner, all very related, so the quick answer to get a new ram, which I did from a completely different breed. Dilute the bad genes. I wish now I had not been so agressive in picking only the best of the best and wish I had paid more attention to keeping broader genetics from the start.
Fred got it right away, crafty fox that he is! So did Gjensen.....quick! Tongue in cheek as Fred put it!I'm not really a "breeder" yet but am dipping in the toe, so to speak, and if there is a way to do it on free range then, by gummy, I'm going to do it. And there is...flock breeding or some variation of that. It's slower, it's not as productive, it's more risky....but it's right down my alley.
Breed the best and eat the rest, bring in better if I can't make what I'm trying to make in a certain amount of time....but I'm betting I'll get there if I just keep culling for the traits I want. It's slow, but sure. I may never get there before I'm gone.....but I'm GOING and that's the important part. That journey, that discovery and challenge, and the fun of trying to create that good bird or the worthy flock.
You guys know me....I never do things the way other folks do it.
If you start with a dynamite quad, trio or pair? It makes a world of difference. Start with some less-than-good birds and you've got to hatch out 100 and hope to improve them over the next 4 years. But, hatch out of your birds, Bee?
I'd not be too concerned. Since I know what you have for your start, you'll do just fine. Hatch out 20, if you can, pick the best, eat the rest. If you need a bird here or there to add, drop me a line.
Quote: Bee-- this is not cheating, it is simply supporting the great breeder and perpetuating really good bloodlines. Well worth doing. Not cheating at all. I'm very excited for you-- I know you have been pondering options for a while. Best of luck with these 2 new lines.