Quote:
If your dog got hit by a car that would be an act of negligence on the owner's part, not the car driver. This was a situation wherein the owner of the chickens was not at fault so therefore had no option to further protect their birds from a dog on their property. They shouldn't have to build a fort knox to keep someone elses' pets out. Therefore, I do think that the 34$ recommendation per bird plus, say, 20$ for injuries to the 3rd bird, should it survive. If it perishes, the cost for it goes also to 34$. In my opinion.
ok another equation then
say you have a poodle and a pit bull comes on your property and rips thats poodle to shreds and kills it
do you think when you go to court you will be compensated for petting that dog throwing that dog a stick putting food in that dogs mouth till he got killed by that pit bull
First, you don't have to get snippy. It's okay if I have a different OPINION than you. That doesn't automatically make myself or you right.
So far as the dog comparison, last time I checked, my dogs did not lay eggs that could A) be eaten and thereby save the cost of buying eggs B) eggs laid to be used for financial gain, i.e. selling them for profit C) lay eggs that could be incubated and sold as either baby chicks or adult birds if I should choose to raise them.
Dogs and chickens are apples and oranges. Chickens provide, via eggs, a way that they can reimburse owners for their feed and lodgings.
Also, I have seen civil court cases where owners of dogs in similar circumstances as you describe be reimbursed for pain and suffering for the early demise of their pets.
I stand by my original opinion. 34$ per bird sounds good to me.