- Thread starter
- #71
Dennis I wasn't planning on engaging in a conversation with you, but since you asked, I have no problem with patents. I do have concerns with what Monsanto is doing with their seed patents because they are establishing a plant (food) monopoly. It is my belief that you can't just have Monsanto once. Once you go Monsanto, you are stuck with Monsanto for life. And sadly, there are allegations that even those who chose to not use Monsanto's GMOs have found themselves in legal battles as the wind carried Monsanto seed to their farm from their neighbors GMO farm.
I do believe that Monsanto may be using the cannabis community as pawns. If Monsanto patented seed is being unknowingly circulated among the community, Monsanto will claim the patent once the FDA gives them the go ahead to grow for the pharmaceutical companies.
To answer your question: I very much support protecting intellectual property. I do not support devious patent monopolies, especially a monopoly as serious as the global food and medicine supply. Clear?
So you only want to protect some peoples intellectual property and you think you're qualified to judge who should be protected ?
Do you really think the people that grow weed are worried about the patent laws ?
