Glyphosate in Chicken Feed- Should I be concerned or not?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pics
Hello I'm not trying to stop you from eating poison at your own desire. :) I'm just striving to eat poison free and give my opinion to curious people that it is not safe.

Oh, and billions of dollars of settlement payments and paid for studies might have something to do with it being only a single government body. Just saying.🧐
I agree there is a money motive for finding Monsanto liable, yes.

As to the rest?

Concern (a polite word for fear) is reasonable. But if the fear is not in proportion to the risk, it is IRRATIONAL.

The Dosage is the Poison.
as has been known for several hundred years, at least, in the Western World, and much longer in the Easter world.

Every MSDS I linked in response to your earlier comment is deadly, dangerous, or downright lethal in sufficient dosage.

The Oral LD50 - that is, the dose expected to be lethal 50% of the time - is as follows:

90,000 mg/kg for Water in rats (6 liters in several hours reportedly lethal for humans)
3,000 mg/kg for Salt in rats (s we can say salt is 30x more toxic than water)
2,000 mg/kg for Vitamin A in rats (so Vitamin A is about 50% more lethal than Salt)

and Glyphosate? its 5,000 mg/kg in rats. (2.5x SAFER then Vitamin A. 1.66666666x safer than table salt).

Now someone can reasonably argue that you need water, salt, vitamin A to survive. You don't need Glyphosate. I'm certainly not rushing out to the farm store to grab a bottle to have with dinner. But if I did, its likely to be less lethal than an equal amount of Vodka (80 proof is around 2,000 mg/kg, similar to Vitamin A).

So while I might have some very mild concern about Glyphosate in my food, I'm much less concerned by it than the amount of Salt and certain Vitamins added to our foods.
 
Last edited:
I agree there is a money motive for finding Monsanto liable, yes.

As to the rest?

Concern (a polite word for fear) is reasonable. But if the fear is not in proportion to the risk, it is IRRATIONAL.

The Dosage is the Poison.
as has been known for several hundred years, at least, in the Western World, and much longer in the Easter world.

Every MSDS I linked in response to your earlier comment is deadly, dangerous, or downright lethal in sufficient dosage.

The LDL50 - that is, the dose expected to be lethal 50% of the time - is as follows:

90,000 mg/kg for Water in rats (6 liters in several hours reportedly lethal for humans)
The company that produces Roundup (glyphosate) just had a $2 billion dollar settlement in court for cancer caused by their product. The LD50 is irrelevant

Humans grew food just find before they started spraying this poison on everything
 
The company that produces Roundup (glyphosate) just had a $2 billion dollar settlement in court for cancer caused by their product. The LD50 is irrelevant

Humans grew food just find before they started spraying this poison on everything
12 people and bad science.

I don't live my life based on the musings of the 12 most ignorant people a handful of lawyers can find to fill a jury box. Neither would the EPA, whose expertise on this subject (for all their admitted failings) exceeds mine or yours. Or the WHO. Or the British Health System. or the FAO. or a number of other assumedly qualified organizations to opine on such subjects.

Its a lot more plausible that Class Action attorney bought an expert than that Monsanto bought the rest of the world.

But hey, class action attorneys are always up front and honest. - they wouldn't manufacture claims for money. "Ambulance Chaser" has no basis in reality, right? Absolutely upstanding citizens, like Stan Cheslsey, Rudy Giuliani, and lots of others. Its easy money. Absolutely wouldn't lie. That would be bad. People's lives are at stake.

Shall I continue? Its easier than seating a jury of 12 with no background knowledge of the subject of trial lacking excuses to get out of jury duty.
 
Last edited:
To be fair, I am friends with a number of very good attorneys who happen to be very decent people. I don't mean to disparage the whole profession. I've simply been employed in a field where I have seen, time and again, that the US justice system is poorly equipped to reliably find truth.
99% of the lawyers give the rest a bad name?
 
99% of the lawyers give the rest a bad name?
I could name probably two hundred attorneys, both plaintiff and defense side, whom I've personally known to be honest and trustworthy over the decades. Several hundred others I don't know well enough to make that assessment, and only a handful I know to be dishonest.

Lucky me?
 
I could name probably two hundred attorneys, both plaintiff and defense side, whom I've personally known to be honest and trustworthy over the decades. Several hundred others I don't know well enough to make that assessment, and only a handful I know to be dishonest.

Lucky me?
I would say yes.

The most person interaction I ever had with an attorney was a dad I babysat for in high school. I wasn't in a position to know much about his professional life.

The questions I now wish I had asked...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom