LED's are perhaps a future but we need lighting every day rather every night NOW.
All of you complaining about CLF's light quality remember if you buy 2200 K CLF I bet you can not tell difference between incadescent bulb and CLF. They come in range of 2200 K (warmest more yelowish light just like incadescent) then 4600K, 5600K 6400K. The last one is the one most people objects to ("cool" light).
Unfortunately I never seen those in Wallie or Home depot. Department stores sell cheap CLF's which are not even market as for they K (Kelvin) output. Most of them falls in the midrange about 4600K and 5600K.
I mailordered them 2200K 30Watts CLF's and I am very happy with the light color. I also found 30W is the most price and energy efficient CLF, actually giving me 2000 lumens of light , a lumen is an amount of light (more tham 100W incadescent and more than "standart 23W or 25W CLF's offered in stores).
As for mercury scare and paranoia does anybody know that
fluorescent lights (tubes) commonly used since the 1930's contain much more mercury than CLF's due to their much larger cubic volume?
Yet nobody ever pointed it out. I bet eveybody has used them fluorescent tubes or is still using them in kitchens, bathrooms, under cabinets etc.
So don't be paranoid about mercury.
And CLF's are using about 50% less power and generate very little heat (extra savings on Air in hot climates - southern states).
So until they come up with suitable and affordable LED's I'll be using CLF's.
In current state of technology and proper selection they are the "right choice".
At the same token I am against government telling anybody what bulbs to use. If you want incadescent and you are willing to pay for most energy turning into heat instead of light, you should be able to do so.
As a proof incadescent bulbs turn most energy into heat not light is a fact that we use them in brooders, and homemade incubators. LOL
All of you complaining about CLF's light quality remember if you buy 2200 K CLF I bet you can not tell difference between incadescent bulb and CLF. They come in range of 2200 K (warmest more yelowish light just like incadescent) then 4600K, 5600K 6400K. The last one is the one most people objects to ("cool" light).
Unfortunately I never seen those in Wallie or Home depot. Department stores sell cheap CLF's which are not even market as for they K (Kelvin) output. Most of them falls in the midrange about 4600K and 5600K.
I mailordered them 2200K 30Watts CLF's and I am very happy with the light color. I also found 30W is the most price and energy efficient CLF, actually giving me 2000 lumens of light , a lumen is an amount of light (more tham 100W incadescent and more than "standart 23W or 25W CLF's offered in stores).
As for mercury scare and paranoia does anybody know that
fluorescent lights (tubes) commonly used since the 1930's contain much more mercury than CLF's due to their much larger cubic volume?
Yet nobody ever pointed it out. I bet eveybody has used them fluorescent tubes or is still using them in kitchens, bathrooms, under cabinets etc.
So don't be paranoid about mercury.
And CLF's are using about 50% less power and generate very little heat (extra savings on Air in hot climates - southern states).
So until they come up with suitable and affordable LED's I'll be using CLF's.
In current state of technology and proper selection they are the "right choice".
At the same token I am against government telling anybody what bulbs to use. If you want incadescent and you are willing to pay for most energy turning into heat instead of light, you should be able to do so.
As a proof incadescent bulbs turn most energy into heat not light is a fact that we use them in brooders, and homemade incubators. LOL
