- Jul 10, 2010
- 26
- 0
- 22
This is certainly an interesting thread. I too believe that keeping illegal chickens is an act of civil disobedience, rather than outright law breaking which implies murder or larceny. And I will willingly partake in appropriate civil disobedience, just as I would if I felt that someone was being discriminated against. Those posters that are concerned about law breaking might once have driven over 65 on the highway or not buckled in when in a taxi or any number of other "harmless" yet illegal activities. This is our zoning reg: "no more than two (2) adults of a species per household number may be kept: Dogs, cats, fowl, or others compatible with cohabitation with humans may be kept on the minimum lot areas." I have six mostly quiet hens (some announcing when an egg is laid, but minimal) in a fenced in run where both the coop and run are de-pood daily. (Or is it de-pooed?) Since there are a lot of folks with more than two cats (who used to poo in my kids' sandbox, back when we had one, btw) or more than two dogs, which often get free and poo in my yard, I don't feel bad about having my hens who keep to themselves and bring me all sorts of delight. They are behind the garage by two neighbors' properties, but with fences between our property and each of the neighbors. We give them eggs from time to time, and nobody seems to mind. In fact, a neighbor down the street is thinking about getting chickens herself. Should the need arise, I will advocate strongly on the legal level to have our zoning regulations changed, and I believe there will be support for this. The republicans should like the idea of smaller government with less legislation of my personal rights, and the democrats should like the fact that I am being environmentally friendly and dabblling in sustainable agriculture. Until then, the chickens and I will keep our heads low.